Unfinished Business…
"And I sincerely believe
with you, that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies;
& that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity, under the
name of funding, is but swindling futurity on a large scale."
– Thomas Jefferson
“When we saw what happened in
Parkland, we were so disturbed and upset.
We love these kids and their rallying cry, ‘Enough is enough.’ It got to
us.”
- Edward Stack, CEO Dick’s
Sporting Goods
By J.M. Hamilton
(3-4-2018)
This coming September
15, 2018 will mark the 10th anniversary of the Lehman event (to this day, the
largest bankruptcy ever recorded).
An event that many
Americans will remember contributed to the largest bank bailout in the nation's
history, the financial crisis, and the Great Recession. The
financial contagion was not confined to the U.S. but many countries
throughout the West suffered from TBTF banks that were leveraged to the hilt, and
gambling w/ depositor - and ultimately, taxpayer - money. Economies have
since healed to varying degrees, but not all have recovered (e.g. Greece and
Italy), and arguably, none have fully recovered.
In fact, the bailouts
continue to this very day... see the ECB and Federal Reserve's hyper accommodative
monetary policies, where real yields over the last decade - adjusted for
inflation - have often been negative or below 1%. Basically providing
banks a handout w/ free money, and transferring wealth from depositors to
banks, shadow banking, and private equity.
Economist Paul Romer
once famously said, "A crisis is a terrible thing to waste."
And the 2008 crisis was truly wasted. Instead of taking
time to analyze TBTF (too big to fail) banks, the casino atmosphere on Wall Street - backstopped by the American taxpayer, and the structural
defects w/in our economy that have led to explosive wage & wealth
inequality ... the entire crisis was papered over by Republican - and
succeeding Democratic - administrations. Congress - both parties -
owned by the Wall Street banking oligopoly quickly fell into line, and voted
for the bailout (but there was no such relief for 99%, especially on the scale
banks received, and many people lost their homes and jobs).
Of course bank
lobbyist today, w/ the crisis in the rearview mirror & banks making record profits, want to see most of the post-crisis reforms & regulations undone,
particularly the Volcker Rule. The Volcker Rule, in lieu of the
simple reinstatement of Glass-Steagall, sets limits on banks gambling w/
depositor money (as well as taxpayer money, as many bank deposits are federally
insured). And many of the pirates that ran these TBTF banks are still in
charge of their respective institutions to this very day (see Messrs. Blankfein
and Dimon).
Perhaps what was most
remarkable about the bailout, however, was the argument put forth that these
institutions were TBTF, and so critical to the American economy that there was
no other recourse but to adopt the emergency measures that were passed.
Trillions - in an alphabet soup of programs (remember TARP?) and free Fed
money - were thrown at these institutions. And yet, no strings were
attached to the bailout money. The banks were so arrogant about
both the crisis and the subsequent bailout that one CEO was reported to have
said that the banks, leading up to the crisis, were merely: "... doing god's work."
Banks may
not only be key to the American economy, but they are also central to the
transmission of monetary policy, which given the sorry state of U.S. fiscal
policy (now at record debt levels) is the only game in town. And yet, these all important Wall Street banks are operated by a men's only club, who are restricted in their actions by: their bonus plan, the value of
their respective bank’s stock, activist investors, and stock analyst buy &
sell recommendations. The CEOs of these major banks are highly political
men, and certainly play no small role in the dispersion of campaign, PAC,
lobbying, and dark money contributions.
And given their
awesome power, they can even make or break an economy - and an administration
in power - by their collective action or inaction.
All of which begs the
question: Should institutions - w/ virtually no checks upon their power -
have this degree of control over the economy, the government, and the political
process? Much has been made about the
Russian hacking of the 2016 election, but how about the daily money-hack Wall
Street lobbyist engage in w/ our elected politicians? Does the House of Representatives dance for Putin, or do they dance for Wall Street bank executives?
Beyond breaking up
TBTF institutions and - under the most optimistic scenario - reenacting
Glass-Steagall, should such powerful institutions be allowed to exist in their
present structure?
To cut to the chase,
should commercial lending institutions - given that they are the cornerstone of
the economy & possess awesome power over the government - be operated as not-for-profit institutions? If we drill down and are honest w/ ourselves,
it was the fact that these institutions are - so concentrated, under tremendous pressure to make profits, and absolutely key, bank executive compensation
incentives drives decision making that is often not in the best interests of the country - that directly led to the 2008 crisis.
Do we want the crooks
in Congress running Wall Street commercial lending... absolutely NOT.
Does the private sector do many wonderful things?
Answer: Absolutely,
particularly in a functioning free market, w/ many competing entrants w/in a
given market place or economic sector.
But would the
American economy - as well as the health of our democracy/republic - be better
served by a Wall Street commercial lending group that was run as
not-for-profits?
JMH believes that
case could easily be made for this manner of economic structural reform ...
Sure allow investment banks to continue to be operated by the profit
motive (albeit no longer backstopped by the taxpayer, that is to say, federally
insured). Take away the profit motive, excessive Wall Street pay packages
& incentives, the continual grind to push the stock price ever higher, and
instead, incentivize not-for-profit, commercial lending banks to
increase loan to deposit ratios, responsibly, at the lowest possible interest
rate, w/out bankrupting the institution or shafting depositors.
What U.S. citizens
are likely to end up w/ is a much safer banking industry, a stronger
economy, a better monetary policy conduit, and the end of future financial crisis (at least the end of
financial crisis initiated by commercial lending institutions, as presently
operated).
Then again, perhaps,
the shifting of commercial lending from a for profit to a nonprofit model isn't
necessary. To hear BOE's Governor, Mr.
Mark Carney, tell it last week, on Bloomberg Surveillance, cryptocurrency may ultimately eliminate banking
intermediaries (aka the bankster middleman), altogether. Hence, the rush
to regulate cyber currency, and for banks to begin co-opting many cryptocurrency
attributes.
JMH isn't the only person thinking not-for-profits are
an excellent hedge against a corrupt U.S. government, or private sector excess. Messrs. Bezos, Buffett, & Dimon have
been talking about setting up not-for-profit healthcare for their
employees, as a means to mitigate and possibly control ever spiraling
healthcare costs.
The not-for-profit model argues for
maximum efficiency, while eliminating - or mitigating - cutthroat profit
taking and government corruption.
It's as if many corporations - most recently - have taken Mr.
Fink's (of BlackRock fame) advice to heart, and have opted not only to make
money, but to act in a more socially responsible manner. In some
instances, CEOs are demonstrating leadership, where owned politicians fear tread.
Against the backdrop of the latest mass shooting, several
corporations have stepped forward to either disassociate, if not outright
cut ties with - the extremist & terrorist group - The NRA (the lobbying arm for
the gun industry).
These socially conscious businesses are to be commended, and
further encouraged to take responsible action, and support
politicians, who will - in turn - advance the same agenda.
There are too many stories like the ones that ran on Disney last week. Namely, that while Disney is minting billions, many of its employees
are living in cars.
Might corporations and multinationals, given exceptional profits
and low tax rates, begin to support a living wage and gender pay parity? Some estimate that gender pay parity would add trillions to the global economy.
The bottom line is a company can enhance their bottom line
by doing the right and socially responsible thing. Just as
there are boycotts, there are also buycotts, where consumers reward socially
responsible companies by purchasing more of their product.
Isn’t that the way it should be? Some might call this consumers voting w/ their purses and wallets.
Selah.
Copyright JM Hamilton Publishing
2018