Sunday, March 8, 2020

Another Black Hole in the US Healthcare Model: Workers' Compensation Insurance

Another Black Hole in the US Healthcare Model: Workers' Compensation Insurance  


By JM Hamilton (3-8-2019)

As part of JMH’s ongoing series on the failed US Healthcare system, this week we tackle an often overlooked, little discussed, corner of the US Healthcare system, Workers’ Compensation insurance (or WC, a fifty-five billion dollar market).

First a little background:  WC insurance schemes are designed to protect labor from workplace disease and injury, but in the event of either occurrence, WC provides medical care for injured employees, and compensation for lost wages & even untimely demise.  Generally, WC coverage is designed to be no fault, that is to say, provide exclusive remedy (to protect employers from litigation). 

WC coverage – both private and public – began with labor movements from the late 19thand early 20th centuries, due to chronic labor abuse by ownership.  Reform started in Europe and spread to North America. Two systems, initially, were derived:  A German model characterized by considerable centralized control; nonprofit associations administering benefits and claims, which employers contributed to; and a no-fault compulsory system broadly applied to all classes of labor. The British model, initially, was characterized by WC being elective; insurance provided by private carriers; and the administration of benefits was adversarial and litigated in the courts.

Today, in the US, federal workers are covered under a system resembling the German model w/ monopolistic coverage provided by the government… whereas, American non-federal government employees (i.e. private sector employees) fall under the auspices of fifty different state insurance bureaus & regulatory bodies (w/ widely varying benefits and laws). There is no federal control over WC coverage presently, beyond US federal workers and certain classes of employees (i.e. mine workers, maritime workers, et al.).

As the US system today all too often fails in its ability to cover injured workers’ medical expense and indemnification of lost wages (especially for serious disability & injury), the federal government often must step in to provide backstop and support, via Social Security benefits (see SSI and SSDI) and Medicare/Medicaid.  Similarly, in Europe, today, many countries have a monopolistic system (sometimes with private insurer involvement, but generally run by the state) that folds WC benefits directly, and indirectly, into relatively generous social programs. 





So here again, as mentioned in my recent piece, Storm Clouds Over US Healthcare, we have the American public – more specifically, labor – facing off against a large number of powerful special interests that have little or no desire to see true reform for WC coverage & injured worker care.   

Among these special interests:

Doctors;
Big Pharma; 
Pharmacies; 
Hospital chains;
Lawyers (who make considerable income off WC and employers’ liability litigation);
And US federal & state government politicians (who enjoy campaign, lobbying, and PAC largesse from the aforementioned interests).

No wonder then that there is little in the way of federal level reform of a WC system that has failed American labor and the US economy. The fallout from the lack of sustained and substantive WC reform – by the Federal government - has led to micro and macro repercussions for Americans and the US economy. (None of this should surprise anyone at a time that the US government has consistently sided w/ billionaires & multinationals in labor and labor rights evisceration.)

We’ve seen an opioid epidemic and the US WC system played no small role in the administration of pain killers, like Purdue Pharma’s now infamous & deadly OxyContin.  We’ve seen a rise in “deaths of despair” among blue collar workers, left behind by AI, automation, globalization and uncertainty surrounding a Silicon Valley creation, The Gig Economy.  

Spiraling US medical costs and the resulting increase in WC costs & premiums (WC insurance is often one of the largest expenses American employers face, outside of labor cost) have played a role in US manufacturing, and employers in general, seeking out labor in emerging market countries.  Rising WC premiums - and the lack of reform – have also helped drive the move to the outsourcing of labor, domestically, to the aforementioned Gig Economy and to third parties, Temp Agencies and Professional Employer Organizations (PEO).  All of which are designed, in the majority of instances, to sidestep (or significantly mitigate) Workers’ Compensation premium and expense, as well as, the requirement to maintain a safe work environment.  Safety can be expensive.

As for the nation – at a macro level - a defective, dysfunctional, and very expensive Healthcare and WC system means US goods and services can be uncompetitive in the global economy, which contributes to escalating trade deficits. (This in turn leads to more automation, globalization, outsourcing of labor… along w/ the attendant hollowing out of the middle class.) Remember, US healthcare now eats away at nearly 20% of US GDP.  Of course, not all of this can be laid at Workers’ Compensation insurance’s doorstep … some of the aforementioned economic trends (like outsourcing and globalization) can be directly attributed to greed.  

Apple is the classic example of a US multinational exploiting Chinese labor, often supplied by a third-party company, Foxconn.  However, Apple could still make an extravagant profit markup on the iPhone, utilizing American labor.  

Either way, once again, we see multivariate layers of administrative costs and expense, due to redundant medical care, various insurance schemes, and two healthcare programs: one for Health insurance and a second for Workers’ Compensation medical coverage. In addition, there exists today, in America, private and public versions of each, Healthcare and WC coverage.  Tack on WC litigation and it’s a very expensive mess, and a barrier to entry to creating a business. 

We can also see a lack of interest or will from the political duopoly, owned by the aforementioned powerful special interests – including Wall St., to do anything about our broken Healthcare and WC systems.  

The solution is simple: a consolidated Healthcare plan under the US government, for Healthcare and WC medical coverage, combined.  The economies of scale of a Medicare For All model – particularly if the government is finally allowed to negotiate on the behalf of the American people against the aforementioned special interests – should save the economy, employers, investors, and American labor & taxpayer considerable sums (vis a vis the current system). Additionally, American labor would likely become more competitive, versus global competition.

Not to place too fine a point on it, in order for a consolidated Medicare for All program to succeed, inclusive of WC medical coverage, the government must be allowed to negotiate against special interests.  And where the private sector refuses to respond, the government must step in to provide competition. Given the arrogance & greed surrounding Big Pharma, at some point the US government may have to get into the medicine manufacturing business, so as to achieve its mandate.

A failed ACA program has clearly demonstrated that costs only escalate higher, if the government allows healthcare monopolies and special interests to run roughshod over the American consumer, labor, and taxpayer.

Copyright JM Hamilton Publishing 2020


Saturday, February 22, 2020

Fear and Loathing in Nevada: The Bell Tolls for Bloomberg…

Fear and Loathing in Nevada: The Bell Tolls for Bloomberg… 


“Democrats are not going to win if we have a nominee who has a history of hiding his tax returns, of harassing women, and of supporting racist policies like redlining and stop-and-frisk. Look, I’ll support whoever the Democratic nominee is. But understand this: Democrats take a huge risk if we just substitute one arrogant billionaire for another.”

-       Senator Elizabeth Warren

By JM Hamilton (2-22-2020)

Inside sources tell JMH that if one visits the Paris, Nevada auditorium, where the Dem presidential debate was held last Wednesday night, one can still smell the faint odor of burnt plutocrat.   

Clearly, the Nevada performance (and this is coming from a Bernie - Warren fan) left no doubts as to the smartest candidate running, from either party...  that title belongs to Senator Elizabeth Warren. (Obviously, Senator Sanders suffers no deficit in the smarts department either.)  The Mayor of NY – slumping on the debate stage, eyes rolling - looked like a man who had lived in a billionaire bubble all his life, especially after Senator Warren took him to task for scores of NDAs (nondisclosure agreements) that are said to exist between the Mayor, his company, and former Bloomberg women employees.  The long-term impact of the debate still remains to be seen, but there appears to be little doubt that a billionaire running for the Dem nomination – particularly with Mr. Bloomberg’s record - in the year 2020 - is a complete exercise in folly.  Quite possibly, it may prove out that Mr. Bloomberg, in the furtherance of his presidential ambitions, is better off dumping his hundreds of millions directly into the ocean.

To break that conclusion down further, it’s very important to look at Mr. Bloomberg’s candidacy from three different perspectives.

First, we have to compare the Mayor with the current White House occupant, Donald Trump:

Both Bloomberg and the POTUS are racists.  Stop and frisk versus voter suppression and any number of comments and actions taken by Trump more than prove the point.

Bloomberg and The Donald are homophobic.  Shockers.

Both men have exceptionally vile track records in their treatment of women, from wanton sexism to allegations of rape and unwanted sexual advances.  

Bloomberg and The Don both embrace an authoritarian management style, as exhibited w/in their public and private careers.

Bloomberg and Trump, moreover, love dictators… See Bloomberg standing up for China’s communist leader.

Which of course, brings us to the myriad number of foreign conflicts of interests both men generate.  Gee, does The Donald, and Mr. Bloomberg, look out for the interests of their foreign holdings & business dealings or do they look out for US values and Americans? 

Both plutocrats have advocated, and supported, gutting Social Security and Medicare.  Multinational welfare & financed tax cuts for the exceptionally wealthy, on the other hand, are all good.

Mike and Donald give to charities, which doesn’t point to their generosity, but rather, draws attention to our completely rigged tax code (which allows these men to accumulate vast fortunes, while leaving the less fortunate – the 99% - to pick up their tax avoidance tab).

As it stands, both men own their respective political parties.  Trump has not only become the face of the Republican Party, but he also has a lock on his base. Bloomberg doesn’t possess the Dem base, and it’s doubtful that he ever will, but clearly the New Yorker has purchased the Democratic National Committee.

Both Bloomberg and Trump are Republicans. Take away Bloomberg’s efforts at gun control, and the Donald’s policies on trade protectionism, and you basically have two centrists, who cater to billionaires, C-Suite trash, dictatorships, and multinationals. 

Bloomberg and Trump love the police and surveillance state, and therefore, the gutting of your civil liberties.  Bloomberg runs an arm of the surveillance state, via his company, and he installed a police/surveillance state w/in NY City, during his time as Mayor.  Trump, on the other hand, and despite his well-publicized feuds, has backed every spy agency, with foreign and domestic portfolios, during his time in the White House.

Both men are foreign policy hawks… and both will, or have, doubled down on endless war.

Donald is a political chameleon, changing his spots from Dem to Republican; while the Mayor has changed his stripes from GOP to Independent to Dem.  Bloomberg’s money wouldn’t do much good today, w/in the GOP, so what better way for the plutocracy to, attempt, to gain a lock on both political parties than to run Bloomberg as a Dem?


In short, nuances aside, when we compare Bloomberg and Trump – from management style to a web of foreign conflicts of interest to their treatment of women & minorities – there’s no daylight between the two fascists.



Photo via the Washington Post




It’s amazing.  Less than 12 years after the financial crash, and we have a product of Wall Street running for POTUS.  A man who made his tens of billions by catering to Wall Street royalty, the very sharks who destroyed the global economy.  Bloomberg has calculated that Americans have already forgotten about the crisis (the fallout of which, is very much w/ us to this day), or he lives in such an entitled bubble that it hasn’t dawned on him that Wall Street’s ongoing demolition of the US economy is likely to prove the key deal killer to his candidacy.

It all goes back to the entitlement, hubris, and ignorance of the billionaire class… particularly among the Wall Street elite.  Here I’m thinking of – doing god’s work – Lloyd Blankfein, former CEO of Goldman Sachs.  Or – bank bailout king – Jamie Dimon popping off about socialism at Davos 2020.

In regards the Wall Street connection, I’ll leave my readers with three quick thoughts:  a) when Wall Street was bailed out – a bailout that continues to this day, especially courtesy of the Federal Reserve – Mr. Bloomberg was also saved and his fortune has only grown; b) per former Fed Chair Paul Volcker, Wall Street hasn’t produced anything useful since the ATM (and I’ll take that a step further, Wall Street banks are little more than a predatory tax upon all Americans); and finally, c) is Mr. Bloomberg – as he claims - really going to rein in his Wall Street buddies?  

And the last perspective… what does it say about the DNC, with all the corruption and fallout from 2016, not to mention a catastrophic loss to Trump, that the Dem establishment would bring on board, bending all rules, a man of Mike Bloomberg’s deformed character and history?

What it tells me, dear readers, is that the DNC is just as corrupt and plutocratically hacked as it was in 2016.  As the second political arm of the US political duopoly, bending rules to allow Mike to hit the Nevada debate stage (despite numerous moral & policy failings) demonstrates that the party elite refuse to learn the lessons from the last presidential election cycle.  And rather than reform, the Dem establishment is putting up a billionaire candidate, who - as pointed out above - is but a mere Trump clone.

As such, the Democratic Party, the lesser of two evils party, is still very sick.  Fortunately, for Americans, and as Senator Warren quickly pointed out Wednesday night – w/ laser like precision - Mike Bloomberg is not the cure but a key problem.

What is the cure?  Well, if the DNC shafts a Sanders or Warren nomination (w/ either candidate achieving a plurality of voters), the solution is the creation of yet another third party, or both candidates, possibly, going Green.  

The political duopoly has served the oligarchy very well, now it’s time to serve the people.


Copyright JM Hamilton Publishing 2020

Saturday, February 8, 2020

Thank You Iowa & Trump…

Thank You Iowa & Trump… 


“You could feel it then,” she told me, “and you can feel that fear now” — chiefly among Senate Republicans.


For three years, we’ve been preparing for this process that officially kicks off tonight in Iowa: the Democratic presidential primary.  Today our chair, @TomPerez, reflects on the reforms we’ve made to make this the most transparent primary in our history.

-      
By JM Hamilton (2-8-2020)

What a week… when historians write of the last seven days, they might say this was the week where the structural defects – and codified corruption – finally caught up with American democracy.  The monied class’ grip on power is so great, and their desire to control their personal piggy bank – the US government – so fanatical, & obsessive, that the plutocrats are willing to burn up any pretense of democracy or the republic. 

Oligarchy reigns, which means feudalism has returned.  Doubt my word?  Take a look at the national debt --- used to bailout Wall Street banks & insurance companies; utilized to prop up asset classes for an elite cadre, see the stock market; and to pay for endless war –-- to which all Americans, but for the privileged few, are indentured.  

To kick off this very strange week, we had a Super Bowl. Like many Americans, I still enjoy the sport on rare occasion and once played… but the game has become insane.  Men wearing spandex – jacked up on whatever substance the League will allow – crashing into each other at the speed of light – decked out in flashy colors – legalized public maiming - preening like peacocks.  The annual bowl game now has all the allure of a wake.  The spectacle that is the Super Bowl reminds us that history repeats again and again:  bread, circuses, and gladiatorial combat to keep the public entertained, while Caesar loots the treasury and bankrupts the country further (so as to keep the epitome of hubris, the empire, maintained).

And speaking of ancient Rome, Caesar would have the loved the treatment our own monarch received from the US senate this week.  Apparently, whatever Trump does – in the furtherance of his political career – is all legal and kosher, per the POTUS’ legal team.  And this obscenity is perfectly acceptable to the republican bootlickers w/in the US senate. 

Yes, this week we saw the senate exactly for what it is: an old folks’ home with senators more interested in maintaining power, and their government sinecure, than in preserving democracy and protecting the republic from a dangerous demagogue.

Unlike the events surrounding Nixon’s resignation, this time: there would be no republican senators placing the nation & principle before political party & the president (save one); there would be no one of Barry Goldwater’s stature visiting Trump and telling him that he must step down, so as to avoid a conviction in the Senate; and finally, there’d be no POTUS Pence telling Americans that our long national nightmare was over.  (A president Pence would only add to the nightmare.)






Nor is the Grand Old Party alone.  The Democratic party had its own moment of insanity during the Iowa caucus this week, where either its own special brand of corruption or incompetence, or both, was on full display.

The Democratic National Committee (DNC) – still controlled by failed centrist leaders (see the Clintons, Obama and the donor class) – also has an issue w/ surrendering power.  Besides - given the list of Clinton Foundation donors and HRC’ subsequent loss in 2016 – payback is owed to wealthy Dems & foreign governments.  And, like the GOP, the billionaire and multinational class - that owns the political duopoly - is not in any hurry to surrender power to two progressive candidates: Sanders and Warren.

As it stands, both parties are owned, and the establishment likes it that way.  That is to say, if the Business Round Table, or members of the US Chamber, own both political parties, then they always win.  

And We The People always lose.

Iowa was a reminder to the public that this DNC is just as incompetent, and filled with self-interest, as the republicans within the US senate.  Both parties detest populism (unless it can be turned against the public, a la Trump), and they really hate progressives.  And these bastards - the billionaire/multinational class - are not likely to go gently into that good night.  Hence, the "plutocrats only" optics of Mr. Bloomberg gaining immediate access to the Dem party, after a couple of well-placed donations; and hence, Mayor – Billionaire – Pete Buttigieg’s dramatic and mysterious rise in the polls and the final Iowa outcome (after days passed, post -caucus, before Iowa’s democratic leadership could pull together results).

Moreover, while JMH is not willing to concede immoral equivalence between the two political parties, there’s not a whole lot of daylight between the two when it comes to kowtowing to corporate, multinational, or plutocratic interests.  And while, to their credit, the Dems in the House have passed a considerable amount of legislation that is favorable to the public… they did so, perhaps cynically, knowing full well that it would never be passed in the Senate.  (The next time a Dem enters the White House – hopefully, in January of 2021 – the majority of Americans are going to want to see executive order after executive order reversing Trump’s tyranny.  Many Americans are going to want to see the courts stacked to the rafters with progressive jurists; and the majority of Americans – who have suffered austerity for decades - are going to want to see the end of the US empire that has bankrupted the United States.)

Isn’t it amazing how the oligarchs always maintain their grip on the US government?  At least ninety percent of the population is divided – and at each other’s throats – meanwhile profits and tax laws favorable to the privileged few remain untouched.   Separately, the courts are being stacked with right-wing politicians, who will definitely do what congress fails to do daily, and that is legislate and make laws from the bench.



Iowa and the US senate are just another in a long series of very unpleasant reminders of how corrupt and deconstructed American democracy has become.  And all that appears before us is often not what it seems, but rather, a sideshow – like so many Super Bowls – while the elite continue to loot, pillage, and sack the US government for personal gain. 

We, dear citizens, are something that does not matter to our own government, but rather, we are a demographic that must be continually distracted and entertained, so the real criminals – the plutocratic elite – can continue to get away with murder.

There are real solutions to the problems the US, and other Western democracies, face, but the current ownership has a vested interest in quid pro quos and the status quo.


Copyright JM Hamilton Publishing 2020