Sunday, April 15, 2018

Monopsony Power Crushes the First Amendment


Monopsony Power Crushes the First Amendment


“I was fired from my job because my employer feared unconstitutional retaliation,” Ms. Briskman said Thursday afternoon. “But on a larger scale, I feel that our democracy is being threatened.”
Her lawyers assert that Ms. Briskman’s gesture was “core political speech” protected by Virginia law and the Constitution. She is seeking $2,692 for two weeks of severance she said she was promised but never received, as well as compensation for legal fees.
“Criticism of our leaders should be encouraged,” Ms. Briskman said Thursday on Twitter



Apple’s Global Security team employs investigators who have previously worked in the U.S. military, U.S. intelligence agencies like the National Security Agency, and law enforcement agencies like the Secret Service and the F.B.I.

- APPLE MEMO URGING EMPLOYEES NOT TO LEAK . . . LEAKS – VF HIVE



By J.M. Hamilton (4-15-18)


Monopolies exert ruinous power over the American economy, politics, and the nation’s fiscal & monetary health.  Indeed, many American monopolies & cartels have market caps, and generate revenue, that exceeds many nation states’ GDP.  And their unbridled power only seems to grow.

Beyond the macro concussion is the equally troublesome impact monopolies hold over everyday Americans, and their Constitutional freedoms.  As noted in my last piece, monopolies and cartels fuel: wage & wealth inequality, political instability, crony government, economic stagnation, and a lack of innovation & growth.  

In Wage & Price Controls, written last year, it was noted that monopolies not only exert extraordinary power over the consumer, the economy, and our government…. But they also exert exceptional power over labor and third-party contractors/suppliers (aka monopsony power).

Federal Reserve Chairs - rubbing their temples - have been left, allegedly, wondering why the trillions in free money pumped into the economy (mainly as a form of Wall Street bank welfare) has not “trickled down,” and has not led to a pick up in wage growth.  The fact that many multinationals force their employees to sign non-competes, and in some instances collude - not to compete for labor - within a given industry, never seems to have dawned on Fed eminentos, as to the reason for the lack of wage growth.  And then there’s the obvious: w/ fewer corps or multinationals w/in a given industry, or fewer publicly traded companies, an employee can be blackballed, and basically excluded from all future opportunity.  See the NFL and the black lives matter protests.

In short, given that our government is owned and refuses to enforce antitrust laws (and said laws are completely out of date), the private sector exerts tremendous leverage over the American worker.  In essence, multinationals may, and sometimes do, demand that US labor do their bidding and adhere to their every command.

And corporations and multinationals are growing bolder, not only in setting expectations in the workplace, but even in dictating an employee’s afterwork behavior and communications.

Sinclair - a growing right-wing cancer w/in the propagandized news media sector - recently made all its affiliates read the same hard-right editorial.  Sinclair is seeking to consolidate local media coverage, so that its right-wing views are spread in a homogenous manner throughout American society.  But it’s not enough for Sinclair to control its employees while at work, Sinclair also wants to control its employees’ after-hours behavior.  As recently noted in the Huffington Post:

Sinclair’s employee handbook, provided to HuffPost, states that the company “may monitor, intercept, and review, without further notice, every employee’s activities using Company’s electronic resources and communications systems.”
The handbook goes on to state, “To be very clear: you should not have any expectation of personal privacy in any communication using Company owned equipment.”
Sinclair isn’t alone.  Apple came out very hard against its employees' First Amendment rights, and threatened to fire anyone - who exercised freedom of speech and acted in their capacity as a whistleblower - in regards corporate misdeeds.   Bloomberg, who broke the story, noted the following:
The Cupertino, California-based company said in a lengthy memo posted to its internal blog that it "caught 29 leakers," last year and noted that 12 of those were arrested. "These people not only lose their jobs, they can face extreme difficulty finding employment elsewhere," Apple added. The company declined to comment on Friday.

Indeed, throughout Silicon Valley major players like Facebook and Google, whose motto used to be “don't be evil,” have taken similarly draconian measures against freedom of speech.  Even going beyond statutes - in some instances -  in making coercive threats that are neither supported by the law nor the Constitution.









And therein lies the rub.  While it can be easily argued that employers should hold lawful and reasonable expectations - concerning an employee’s work place communications and behavior - those expectations should cease when an employee has punched out for the day.  That is to say, as long as an employee is not engaged in illegal acts outside of work, the employer's hold, say, and surveillance over an employee’s non-work hours should be nonexistent.

However, increasingly it seems, employers not only want to control their employees during work hours, but dictate behaviors and communications outside of work itself: under penalty of facing unemployment and greatly diminished job prospects w/in said industry.  And as we heard from Mr. Zuckerberg last week, employers & multinationals have the power to know exactly what their employees' communications and behaviors are 24/7/365.

It turns out Facebook, per Mr. Zuckerberg, not only hoovers up data when you are logged onto Facebook - but also when you’re logged off Facebook, or even if you're not registered, or signed up, for Facebook.  Add in your banking activities, the government surveillance state, internet service providers, and travel records… and there is literally nothing employers don’t have the ability to learn about their employees' behavior outside of work.  

Per Bloomberg, multinationals feed the deep state/surveillance state information, and the state in turn feeds the multinationals data and information.  Insidious.

Where does it end?  With AI, automation, and globalization threatening jobs, employers have more leverage over labor than ever before. The NY Times noted, as far back as 2012, that some employers were increasingly so bold as to tell their employees how to vote. Georgia Pacific - owned and operated by the Koch brothers - was a case in point.

It’s no accident that w/ greater concentration of wealth and power into fewer hands that more Americans are taking to the streets in protest than at any other time, since the Vietnam War.

Therefore, employees need protection - not only from the state’s panopticon - but as important, from personal life intrusions directed by multinationals and the private sector.  

So how exactly to go about it.  Well for starters:

1.   Elect politicians willing to break up cartels and monopolies.  This not only diminishes concentrated economic & political power, but spreads that power among more competitors, and provides labor with more employment options.
2.   Place into office politicians willing to roll back deep state power, as well as, the wholesale mass surveillance intrusion social media actors, like Facebook, have come to exemplify.  Very few have a problem w/ law enforcement surveilling bad actors, as long as a warrant is obtained; but the assumption that all Americans are guilty - and worthy of round the clock surveillance - is both unconstitutional and unacceptable.
3.   Finally, it’s time for both a UBI, as well as, an economic bill of rights to guarantee all Americans economic wellbeing, and their freedoms, from coercion executed by a kleptocracy acting in bad faith.  If workers can lean upon a UBI, or a job guarantee provided by the state, they are less prone to having - or allowing - their freedoms to be infringed upon (by monopolies & multinationals & the billionaire class).

Americans are under economic & political pressures as never before… and monopolies increasingly are the reason why Americans are feeling crushing economic & political oppression.  Whether its the private sector capturing the state and our politicians, or monopolies running the economy for their own ends, suppressing wages, or dictating after hours behavior (monitored w/ the aid and assistance of the governmental and private sector surveillance state)… it’s time for Americans to stand up and demand safeguards and protections, both economic & political. 

The very health of our democracy depends upon systemic reform.  Tech is highly seductive... until one learns it's a tool that can be aimed at one's civil liberties, and utilized to confiscate same civil liberties, as well as, harm the means to earn a living.  Corporations overseeing the private lives of their employees - via the surveillance state - risk playing god, and clearly, are a threat to the First Amendment, if not the Constitution.


Copyright JM Hamilton Publishing 2018



Sunday, April 1, 2018

“Dumb F*cks”?


“Dumb F*cks”?


“Dumb fucks.” That’s how Mark Zuckerberg described users of Facebook for trusting him with their personal data back in 2004.  If the last week is anything to go by, he was right.



By JM Hamilton (4-2-2018)


Happy Birthday Jack.

All that glitters is not gold.  In fact shiny objects all too often turn out to be distractions and a colossal waste of precious energy and time. 

Facebook being a case in point.  

Facebook also reminds its users - and nonusers - that there is no free lunch.  The social media platform requires no fees from its users for a reason, and that is because the platform is not the product, but rather, it’s the bait.  

The product is Facebook junkies, participants, users, friends of same, and their data.  Their data is hoovered up in a privatized version of the surveillance state, and quite often used for very bad ends.

The Cambridge Analytica scandal is just Facebook’s latest in very long list of social media - and Internet giant - scandals.  

Then again, at this point, why is anybody surprised?  

Mr. Zuckerberg himself, the multi-billionaire founder of Facebook, was said to have quipped in 2004 that he couldn’t believe all these “dumb f*cks” were allowing him access to all their data.

And what have hundreds of millions of Facebook users, and their data, beget?  Let’s run down the list shall we:

An increasingly insular society, cut off from each other, and fed a steady diet of distractions - tailored news, and faux-news, stories - that no longer unite us, but divide us as a nation and a people.  The plutocracy couldn’t dream up a better tool to keep the citizenry distracted & divided.

A social media platform used by foreign governments, and their agents, to send targeted advertisements & fake news through to a sellected audience, w/ the goal of swaying elections and their outcomes.  That is to say, Facebook may very well be a threat to our democracy, election outcomes, and our government.

Facebook is just another tool of the surveillance state, whereby the NSA, CIA, FBI, and multinationals hoover up data.  Together - along w/ banking, search engine activity, and travel records - an online dossier can be created on any individual (certainly upon the 90% of Americans who now use the web).  Hence, threatening our very civil liberties, freedoms, and The Constitution.

Bloomberg recently released a piece, that the media platform is utilized by scam artists.  Moreover, Facebook has not only played fast and loose in allowing targeted selling by said scam artists, but has actually facilitated and participated in the scam, costing Americans and the legitimate economy billions.

No less insidious, Facebook has been utilized all too often as a means of cyber-bullying, which have led to fatalities and teen suicide.

Social media platforms – like Facebook - can lead to a form of addiction, essentially making some users slaves to their sites.  This Facebook addiction, or slavery, can cause family, social, and workplace dysfunction (and even child neglect).

And the list goes on.

So why should we allow such a dangerous tool to continue to exist?   A media platform that facilitates, or is utilized to support terrorism; mass surveillance (that only a Nazi or Stasi could love); teen suicide; billions in fraud; a gross invasion of privacy; a nefarious economic drain; and the steady erosion of our civil liberties, the Constitution, and our democracy.

The answer, per the usual, is money. 

Some would argue that Facebook has become too big to fail (TBTF), that it employs too many people, directly and indirectly, to let it go.  And Facebook is, of course, a FANG stock, which up until recently, had produced terrific results for it shareholders, and index funds.  Unfortunately, the exposed Facebook business model more recently cost a $60 billion loss in market cap, and this may fall further still as the revelations continue to snowball.

Multinationals love Facebook because it has become an indispensable employee surveillance tool.  And if there’s one thing multinationals and the oligarchy love, it’s big data analytics and mass surveillance.  There’s a reason why Facebook and Google, combined, suck in the vast majority of online ad revenue.

Even government surveillance - which taps directly into social media platforms, like Facebook - has become, increasingly, privatized; that is to say, government surveillance has become just another money making venture (the efficacy of which is continuously in doubt).

My own experiences w/ the enterprise are rather limited.  When the JMH blog was established, Facebook was visited in hopes of drawing attention to my writing.

No sooner had Facebook’s terms of use, or agreement, been clicked, when before my very eyes, it began to hoover up every contact, email address, and phone number on my computer.  Let’s just say, the plug on my computer was immediately pulled; my guess is, it was too late.  From that moment on, JMH refrained from utilizing the site, and the account is now in the process of being deleted, altogether.   

As an avowed non-Facebook user, my readers should know there are dozens of ways to share your baby, birthday, and vacation pictures with family & friends, via the World Wide Web.  There are also ways to meet new friends, and be liked by said friends (and better use one’s time), via old-school human contact and the donation of one’s time to philanthropic pursuits.  

How quaint, and yet, how very timely.

All this is to say, you don’t have to be a participant in Facebook’s scam, nor do we have to be one of Mr. Zuckerberg’s “dumb f*cks.”













Last week, former Supreme Court Associate Justice, Stevens, wrote an op-ed piece in the NY Times.  In the editorial, Mr. Stevens proposed the repeal of the 2nd Amendment, which - initially - one might consider to be rather extreme.  But when we factor in an ever growing body count - particularly among young people & the NRA’s chokehold over our cowardly and ineffective Congress - Mr. Stevens' recommendation seems hardly novel at all.  

In fact, the repeal of the 2nd Amendment sounds positively prudent, given that our government is now controlled - and run for - monied interests, among them the NRA.

Likewise, if anybody is expecting real reforms out of Congress, in the wake of successive data theft & privacy invasion scandals (from the Snowden revelations to Equifax and most recently, Facebook) … dream on.

Facebook has already hired an army of lobbyist. And if past is prologue, it’s a very safe bet that the lackeys in Congress will hold hearings - complete w/ stern admonishments - order a committee study… and drag the process out, so that the Facebook scandal is off the front pages before they act.  The Congress’ actions, if any, of course, in response to the Facebook criminal enterprise, will be completely unacceptable.

That is to say, Facebook will have gotten its money’s worth from K Street.

Some still believe that it’s better to have the private sector run the United States, than a truly democratic government (that is to say, a government that is not owned by special interests).  But in allowing the private sector - multinationals & the plutocracy – to own and run our government, what has it yielded (?): our children are not safe at school, and thanks to the NRA, risk being gunned down in a hail of lead; our democratic institutions are under threat by social media platforms, like Facebook, and an oligarchy bent upon owning the government (and Mr. Zuckerberg’s billions means that he very much is a part of said oligarchy); multinationals evade rules, regs, taxation, and paying a living wage, thanks to free trade agreements and globalization; because of the MIC, America is caught in never ending - bankrupting - wars; and post-Wall Street bailout, the banks have driven & led consolidation throughout the U.S. economy (which has fueled wage & wealth inequality, political instability, crony government, economic stagnation, and a lack of innovation & growth).

Many of these institutions, like Facebook, are considered to be too big to fail.  But in reality none of them are.  Just as too many Americans are slaves to, allegedly, TBTF social media, circa 2018, there was a time when another institution w/in the American economy was considered TBTF throughout the Southern states, circa 1860.  


Hopefully, it won’t take a Civil War to end the degradation, destruction, & tyranny of soul sucking monopolies and cartels - like Facebook.  As a result of the Civil War, America produced the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments: which ended slavery; provided equal protections to all citizens under the law; and gave all male Americans the right to vote.

Hopefully, it won’t take a Civil War to repeal the 2nd Amendment, and add additional Amendments, protecting privacy and personal digital data integrity (that is to say, our very lives).

Increasingly, the billionaire class & multinationals (i.e. the 1%) are finding themselves alone on some of these issues.

Given how the U.S. Congress is completely inept and owned - at least presently - it may take a Constitutional Convention to save our democracy and our personal freedoms, from further encroachment by the kleptocracy and the likes of Facebook.  

A Constitutional Convention could also allow Americans to sort out other issues, like: term limits for Congress; popularly electing the Fed Chairman and SCOTUS members; and enacting & enforcing true campaign finance reform.

Copyright JM Hamilton Publishing 2018