Sunday, August 25, 2019

Class Warfare


Class Warfare

“There’s class warfare, all right,” Mr. Buffett said, “but it’s my class, the rich class, that’s making war, and we’re winning.”


By JM Hamilton (8-25-2019)

The Business Roundtable (BR) – a very-much-for-profit entity, consisting of the crème de la crème of America’s CEOs – came out w/ a public policy statement last week, which stood fifty years of laissez faire business ideology - and the profits before all ethos - on its head.

Instead – and obviously feeling the political sand shifting directly under their feet - the CEOs of the BR propose a capitalism that works for all stakeholders w/in American society. 

The BR commits to (read hear) among other things:

·      Delivering value to customers;
·      Investing in employees… starting w/ compensating them fairly (moreover, we foster diversity and inclusion, dignity & respect);
·      Dealing fairly and ethically w/ our suppliers;
·      Supporting the communities in which we work; and
·      Generating long-term value for shareholders … we are committed to transparency and effective engagement w/ shareholders.

The irony for any employee who has worked w/in a Fortune 500 Company surely couldn’t have been lost on anyone.  Employees are constantly told the importance of (indeed, evaluated based upon):  honesty, transparency, delivering excellent customer service, community philanthropy, and the achievement of departmental goals.  The meeting of said goals, directly & indirectly, contributes to keeping ownership or shareholders happy.

Failure to meet any of these expectations is, or can be, often grounds for termination. 

Which begs the question, why would the CEOs of the BR feel the need to restate the principles of capitalism  unless of course, the C-Suite brass and the ownership class don’t play by the very same rules they demand of their employees and “stakeholders” daily?

That is to say, what has been business as usual in America – under a profits uber alles regime – for the last fifty years (?): not delivering value for customers; shafting employees; dealing w/ suppliers in an unfair and unethical manner; exiting communities, when another city is willing to provide greater subsidies & tax breaks for the new corporate headquarters; and stiff-arming shareholder requests for business plans & information (say, on how management plans on dealing with: climate change, or poisons - passing as products - issued forth by said company)… as well as, busting & closing down shareholder resolutions requesting greater change & transparency?

Well, in a word, “yes.”  If anyone tunes into Bloomberg or reads business news w/ any degree of frequency, the press is replete w/ stories demonstrating how America’s top businesses, all too often, behave in ways completely antithetical to society’s well-being (while profits and wage & wealth inequality soar). 


In brief, the BR’ new policy statement reminds us that the corporate aristocracy has been waging class warfare against the 99% for the last fifty years, and really amped up the blitz w/ the fall of the Berlin Wall.  It further reminds us of our two-tiered societal structure and justice system, often written about in this very blog.  The last fifty years is best defined by the rise of a Neo-Gilded Age, and directly correlated w/ that ascendency, a brewing and ongoing populist revolt.  That is to say, an economy, government, and justice system for the one percent, versus an economy, government, and justice system for everybody else.









Let’s pretend for a moment that this is actually something more than window dressing and platitudes.  One can be forgiven for being cynical.  Afterall, plutocrats have been wringing their hands - since the ’08 crash and their subsequent bailout by the Federal Reserve - and advocating reform (while often lobbying for the complete opposite behind closed doors, or via their K Street minions).

What exactly would the business & financial elite have to do to achieve the aforementioned goals?

Well, for starters, the BR would need to break up the monopolies and cartels many of the CEOs have ownership stakes in and run daily.  There’s no greater threat to community & democracy than unchecked power; and today, there’s no greater unchecked power than America’s cartel & monopoly economy.  Serious competition w/in US business sectors would provide the checks & balances that are entirely missing today (and that our owned government fails to provide), against the unprecedented economic power the CEOs of the BR wield.  And no, American businesses do not need colossal scale to compete on the world stage, contrary to what we are told daily.  Just ask Boeing.

So as to end fiscal, foreign policy, judicial, monetary, and regulatory capture (that is to say, creating a democratic government that responds to the will of the people, instead of an elite few), BR CEOs would, ideally, need to insist upon campaign contribution and political reforms, such as: term limits; limits to the campaign season; and caps on campaign contributions and spending.  Perhaps a constitutional amendment that would reapportion the Senate in a more representative fashion?  Since we're dreaming, popularly elected SCOTUS members, as well as, a popularly elected Federal Reserve decision making body, including, but not limited to, the Chairperson.

If we are truly going to protect the stakeholders in society, the CEOs of the BR are going to want to put a leash upon – if not altogether eliminate - ALEC, K Street lobbyists & the US Chamber.  It’s these bodies that often advocate policies and positions that no responsible company would be caught dead advocating in public, on behalf of their business patrons (that is to say, ALEC, K Street, and the US Chamber are paragons of the profits before all mentality that has crushed the American Dream and virtuous capitalism).

Since we are talking diversity and inclusion – dignity & respect – among all employees, that pretty much rules out supporting the GOP, which is xenophobic, homophobic, misogynistic and racist.  It’s hard to express & achieve the BR’s new goals and support the political party of bigotry.  Isn’t it?

And while we are placing the US and her communities first, the offshoring of jobs to save a buck, the Uber economy, treating employees as contractors & subcontractors… yeah, that has to go.  And the BR, if its genuine and sincere, obviously must see the need to provide equal pay, paid maternity leave, and a living wage?  Right?

How about investments?  Would we expect a reputable CEO and company to be hanging out w/ dictators and despots on the global stage… dictatorships who behave in ways completely antithetical to America’s, and American multinationals', professed values of freedom, human rights, liberty, rule of law, democracy and yes, even – often ignored – egalitarianism?  Doesn’t really work for CEOs to be seen w/ killers, like MBS and Saudi Arabia, does it?

And then there’s crossover investments, and board seats, w/in America itself.  Should the BR’s CEOs have investments w/ gun manufacturers, how about the ultimate earth killer, Big Oil… what about the MIC, which sells death and mayhem around the globe?   Not a good look, and entirely inconsistent w/ the BR’s renewed conscience.  How about tobacco and Big Pharma, which robs the public and the taxpayer, daily.  Perhaps the BR CEOs could recommend ending some of these industries, or current business practices of same, altogether?  At the minimum, boycott & divestment would seem entirely appropriate. 

What of accounting and tax fairness, simplification, and transparency?  There’s little doubt that such reforms would better serve America, her communities, employees, and yes, even shareholders (done properly, it just might spur aggregate demand).  How about a tax on wealth to mitigate the power of the ownership class, who make unseemly demands of BR CEOs… unseemly demands like taking out massive loans on the corporate credit line to finance dividends and stockholder buybacks?  This debt, if history repeats, setting companies up for failure, during the next economic downturn.  What better way to protect communities, employees, and in the long term, shareholder value?  

Limits on the amount of leverage applied to predatory private equity LBOs?  What better way to protect: bondholders, business, labor, stakeholders, and the American economy?

How about trade agreements that dispense w/ dictators, or that are tied to reforming nondemocratic regimes and improving democracy and human rights?  Such trade agreements just might mitigate the mass migrations we are seeing out of the world's authoritarian/totalitarian regimes & failed states.  What about fair trade agreements that mitigate labor, regulatory, and tax arbitrage, and give labor a seat at the table during negotiations?

Et al., et al.




Yes, let’s not be naïve, or take the BR at its word… but let’s be willing to suspend disbelief for a moment and imagine that these CEOs are, collectively, ready for real change.  It took fifty years of neoliberal ideology to create our present mess; it’s going to take a while – and perhaps a couple of progressive administrations – to unwind.

There’s, obviously, a great deal of money to be made in honesty, truth, and transparency (otherwise these smart business leaders wouldn’t be recommending these changes).  But w/in the short to midterm, the transition to a more compassionate & ethical capitalism, like that proposed by the BR, could prove challenging, indeed.  Perhaps the BR could backup their mission statement, w/ an action plan and a timeline?

At the end of the day, actions speak louder than a press release.

It would be presumptuous for JMH to assume to speak for all Americans….  However, my guess is the majority of Americans would gladly support the aforementioned reforms.

Would it be better if these leaders – and the ownership class - took these actions upon themselves, or wait for a nonviolent political revolution that insisted upon changes, perhaps even far more draconian? 


After all, class warfare, ultimately, is bad for: America, business, capitalism, and profits.


Copyright JM Hamilton Publishing 2019

No comments:

Post a Comment