Israel
& Manifest Destiny?
“I
may say at once that if Britain and the United States emerge victorious from
the war, the creation of a great Jewish state in Palestine inhabited by
millions of Jews will be one of the leading features of the Peace Conference
discussions.” - Cabinet Notes, Winston Churchill 1941
“On
February 1, 1941, several days after Menachem Begin (later, the 6th
Prime Minister of Israel) took over command of IZL, it announced resumption of
the struggle against Britain. The Irgun felt that the war against the
Nazis had been decided; London was now the problem. It immediately began
blowing up or attacking government immigration and income tax offices and
policy buildings. The LHI also launched a number of spectacular attacks;
on August 8 they even tried to assassinate the high commissioner, MacMichael.”
“However, the (British Agatha)
operation also provoked a desire for revenge, as the IZL (Irgun Z’vai Leumi),
rather ironically, took up cudgels for its sometimes enemy, the Hagannah, on
July 22, 1946. Without coordinating with the Hagannah, sappers placed a
number of bomb-laden milk containers in the basement of the King David Hotel in
Jerusalem, which served as the British military and administrative headquarters.
The resulting explosion, which demolished an entire wing of the building and
killed ninety-one people – Britons, Arabs, and Jews – was the biggest terrorist
action in the organizations history.” -
The
above quotes are from: Righteous
Victims, A History of the Zionist – Arab Conflict, 1881 – 2001, by Benny
Morris.
By J.M. Hamilton
(4-1-2015)
Heads
we write about Israel, tails we write about Mrs. Clinton…. Israel it is.
Israeli
Zionist and American Revolutionaries have many things in common, but probably foremost
among them is the fact that they both had to throw out British occupation,
before achieving independence and statehood. The Zionist and Americans
engaging in acts of sedition against the British Crown were likely viewed as
terrorist by the British constitutional monarchy; in both countries, Israel and
the United States, the brave men and women who fought for independence against
the English are viewed as patriots and heroes.
Which
proves the point…. One man’s freedom fighter is all too often another man’s
terrorist, and vice versa. This is not simple moral relativism, but
rather, it’s all a matter of perspective, isn’t it? That, and as we all
know, history is written by winners, in a tightly controlled narrative.
As
a writer, one of the great things about growing older, particularly if you are
a voracious reader and a student of history, is the wealth of information one
has to draw upon. And while there are many great young writers out
there…. Writing about economics and politics without the benefit of experience
or knowledge of history, for me anyway, often only tells half the story.
There’s a lot about the human condition that fascinates
me, but Israel – along with foreign affairs – has always been high up on the
list.
Brought up in a Semi-Evangelical household as a military brat, and with a keen
interest in the study of power, Israel always attracted my attention. As
a young child, I can still remember PM Golda Meir and Mr. Moshe Dayan on the
television set. "Who’s the cool dude with the eye patch?," I
wondered. And later I learned, there was Israel’s many wars and a
constant quest for survival, post U.N. partition: The War of
Independence; The Suez Crisis; The Six-Day War; The Yom Kippur War; Lebanon;
and The Intifada(s), et al. The back story: centuries of oppression and
persecution, pogroms, the Holocaust, and Israel’s fight for the right to exist
and for its very survival throughout the 20th and 21st
Centuries.
I’m
certainly no expert, but I read quite a bit, especially about Mr.
Arial Sharon: Blessed is the Nation who has Arial Sharon as a defense
minister. Indeed.
Who
were these people…? Back from the brink and against crushing odds prospering in
what Mark Twain called a land that “sits in sackcloth and ashes.” Their
backs against the sea….as my mother taught me, “God’s chosen,” winning war
after war. As an American, how could you not admire Israel or their
story, Zionism. The Israeli Jews were underdogs in every sense of the
word, surrounded geographically on all sides, by the Arab world.
Economically, Israel’s Marxist- Socialist beginnings (kibbutz farming and
industrial output), later steering towards a capitalist and, ultimately, a
mixed economy. As a matter of history, and as a people, Israel has held
the world’s attention. As a child I read about the Jewish exodus out of
Egypt, and as a young adult, I read about their 20th Century
European exodus…. For those lucky enough to survive, straight into Palestine.
Military victory after victory, defying time, history, prejudice, and her
enemies, Israel and her citizens are now feared and respected (albeit
grudgingly by many in the Arab world). In the warrior nation, Israel’s
Jewish children are expected to serve in the military at the age of eighteen, a
civic duty that some have argued should be installed in America.
Alas,
Israel a modern day Sparta.
But in the last decade
or so, something has changed. Israel is no longer an underdog; in
fact, Israel – backed by the U.S. – is a regional, and perhaps global,
super-power, and the only country in the Middle East with nuclear weapons. Likud,
Israel’s center right political party (not unlike America’s GOP), ruled the
country throughout the 80s, was a force to be contended with throughout the 90s
and the early 00s, and came back again in 2009, after PM Ariel Sharon split off
in 2005 (forming the political party, Kadima). Likud is now headed up by
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who just won his fourth, unprecedented, term.
And something has changed in Israel, and not necessarily for the better.
Some of the change Israel is going through is robbing the country of Western
sympathy and support it has long enjoyed, and yes, as reported, even support
among American Jewish voters (who tend to vote for the Democratic Party).
Not so ironically, many of these changes are parallel to the American
experience within the same time frame, under GOP rule. Coincidence?
1)
At the same time America’s DoD/MIC/Surveillance State has grown beyond
the control of U.S. politicians, Israel’s
defense industry has grown exceptionally large, is a major employer, and is
one of the largest military equipment exporters in the world. One can
argue, certainly in America, the growth of the MIC has led – just as President
Eisenhower had warned – to its unseemly influence over our democracy and a more
bellicose foreign policy.
2)
Israel’s foreign policy under Likud, has gone from being on the defensive to
being on the offensive, some would argue even expansionist. Witness the
growth of Israeli settlements on the West bank in occupied Palestinian lands
(in violation of the U.N. position that the settlements are illegal), and Israel’s
constant lobbying for a more belligerent, and militarily active, U.S. Middle
East foreign policy. Israel’s lobbying recently reached its apogee,
with PM Netanyahu’s speech before the U.S. Congress. At this speech, the
Israeli PM, among other things, belittled
a sitting President’s foreign policy, and specifically, attacked President
Obama’s attempts at reaching a treaty preventing Iranian nuclear
proliferation. The presumed alternative to negotiations, for the GOP and
the Likud, you guessed it, WAR.
3)
Israel’s economy has become controlled by
oligarchs, and monopolies and oligopolies, leading to economic hardship for
its citizens, and the return of the Labor Party in Israel.
The parallels to the American economy, namely too great a concentration of
wealth and economic/political power into too few hands, is a threat to economic
harmony and social and political stability for both America and Israel.
Indeed, in both countries, economic inequality and wealth concentration is a
threat to democracy itself; and both countries suffer from a severe
want of economic mobility.
Both countries have become the land of the priviledged, under
conservative/right-wing rule.
4)
And speaking of threats to democracy, unprecedented sums of money are flowing
into Israeli elections, much
of it from outside the country. The American corollary and U.S.
right-wing support for the notion that money equal freedom of speech is
obvious.
5)
As in America, Nixon’s Southern strategy immediately comes to mind, race has
featured prominently in Israeli elections. P.M. Netanyahu showed,
clearly, that he was not above playing the race card when the electoral chips
were down by stating that Arab voters are coming out in
“droves.” The fact that Palestinians in the occupied territories of
Gaza and the West bank are disenfranchised, draws obvious comparisons to
America’s Jim Crow (which is alive and well in America, thanks
to the GOP and its push for voter suppression laws, and the GOP's support
of the Criminal Justice Industrial Complex).
6)
The aforementiond obvious comparisons between America and Israel aside, which
are harmful to both countries standing in the world and International Community
as beacons of “democracy,” Israel’s political leadership, particularly right of
center parties, has taking on an attitude towards the indigenous populations
within Palestine that, arguably, are not dissimilar to America’s 19th
Century policies towards Native-Americans. This America attitude
culminated in the policy of Manifest Destiny, that is Native-American
subjugation and elimination, and the resulting land grab. Is
Israel on the same track? P.M. Netanyahu’s actions speak louder than
words, particularly in his recent incurrisions into Gaza, and the growth of Israeli
West Bank settlements; but Mr. Netanyahu finally tipped his hand in last
week’s election, when he stated that he no longer believed in a two state
solution. Once the P.M. was safely re-elected, after playing
both fear and race cards, he quickly backtracked from both statements – and
returned to paying lip service to two states. But few are buying what the
P.M. is selling.
The
path Israel and America, under Likud and GOP leadership, seems to be headed
down together is not good: right wing demagoguery, racism, pandering to
baser instincts and fear, and allowing a plutocracy to run the economy and the
government.
No
wonder the GOP loves King Bibi.
Worse still the
Likud’s abandonment of the two state solution brings into question Israel’s
commitment to democracy. Let’s examine exactly what
a one state solution might Iook like for Israel.
For
starters (Option I), if Israel annexes the West Bank and Gaza, the
demographic explosion of Palestinian voters will make Israel an Arab State or
well on its way to becoming one. An outcome that Israeli Jews are not
likely to desire.
Another
alternative for Israel (Option II) is to annex both Gaza and the West
Bank and leave the Palestinian voters disenfranchised (not unlike the GOP’s
attempts to marginalize and disenfranchise minority voters, and black citizens
for over a century to the present day). This option is neither a long
term solution nor morally legitimate in the eyes of the International
Community, nor is it worthy of a great democracy like Israel.
The
final option (III) for a single state solution is a war of attrition,
not unlike the recent military offensive waged in Gaza…. and a version of Manifest
Destiny brought to Israel. That’s right. Bulldoze Palestinian
homes in the name of fighting terror, and send the Palestinians into diaspora,
upon busses with one way tickets, into the surrounding states of Egypt, Jordan,
Lebanon, and Syria.
Under
the Likud, Options II and III are already tacitly in play, have been for some
time, and are not likely to let up anytime soon. Besides the defense
industry loves constant warfare, and some have even argued Gaza
and the West Bank are now little more than a testing ground for the Israeli
and U.S. Defense and Surveillance industries.
When
you stack up the Palestinians against the Israelis, it’s almost laughable to
suggest that Hammas and the Palestinian Authority are an existential threat to
Israel. What prevents one from laughing is the loss of life on both sides
(particularly children). And the fact that time and time again, just like
U.S. foreign policy under the Bush Administration (W), Israel’s response to
rock throwing and feeble rocket attacks launched from Gaza is, arguably, an
over-reaction, highly
disproportionate, with unintended consequences, and the potential for
considerable blowback. Doubt me on this… just
take a look at the body counts.
Seemingly lost upon today’s Likud leadership is their
recent history. If the Jewish right-wingers could somehow remember their roots,
their ancestors own diaspora, their fore-fathers feelings of being marginalized
politically and economically, and their own fight for freedom and survival
against the Nazis and later, in Israel, as freedom fighters/terrorist against
the British Empire…. Perhaps the Likud could find it within themselves to show
a little empathy towards the Palestinian people. After WWII, much of the
world (especially the West) reacted to the atrocities committed by the Nazis by
giving Israel a seemingly limitless pool of goodwill and political collateral.
But as mentioned above, today’s Israel has tremendous power over events within
the Middle East, not to mention exceptional and extraordinary clout and power
in Washington D.C., within
the Republican Party, and in particular, in the exercise of U.S. foreign
policy (the
GOP has become captured on Middle East foreign policy matters by Israel and
her wealthy supporters); and unfortunately, the Likud
does not always exercise America’s foreign policy in the Middle East to
enlightened ends, or necessarily in America’s interests (allegations
of spying on U.S./Iranian nuclear talks and sharing that information with
Republican Congressmen, notwithstanding).
Right-wingers
within Israel should not take the seemingly limitless pool of goodwill for
granted, particularly when it comes to the mistreatment of minorities, and the
abuse of Israeli fear, as a means for the Likud to retain power. (By the
way, both parties, the Likud and the GOP, abuse fear as a means to distract
voters from real economic problems that exist in both societies.) Yes,
the Palestinian political leadership has much to answer for; but it’s up to
Israel, as the dominant and greater power, to play Statesmen, forgive, and open
the door to peace (if for no other reason than for the sake of both Israeli and
Palestinian children and grandchildren, and Israel's democractic future).
Israel,
with the help of a powerful friend, has arrived as a world power to be admired
and respected… shouldn’t it act accordingly? Only Israel can make the
peace in Palestine, or not. As such, Mr. Netanyahu appears to be at the crossroads.
The
P.M. can make a Faustian deal with Oligarchs,
the MIC, and the devil, based upon endless warfare and annihilating, or
marginalizing, a race of men; or the Israeli P.M. can go down in the history
books, by bravely embracing peace and a two state solution.
Copyright JM Hamilton Publishing
2015