The True Axis of Evil (Part I)
“… the Reagan administration has failed to
promote free trade. Ronald Reagan by his actions has become the most
protectionist president since Herbert Hoover, the heavyweight champion of
protectionists.”
- The Reagan Record on Trade, Rhetoric versus Reality,
by Sheldon L. Richman – Published by the Cato Institute.
By J.M.
Hamilton (Originally Published 10-10-10)
George
Bush first used “axis of evil” on January 29, 2002, during a State of the Union
address, to describe the primary threats to U.S. and world stability: Iraq,
Iran, and North Korea. We now know that Iraq was not a threat
(nobody is looking for WMDs, anymore). And North Korea’s Kim Jong-Il,
dictator of death’s twilight kingdom, when he’s feeling fine, only pokes his
head up long enough to extort aid and financial assistance from the West.
For the moment, Iran’s nuclear ambitions are being sidetracked by a computer
virus named Esther (who needs standing armies, the U.S., probably, has computer
geeks writing malware code). So much for the threat to the West
poised by President Bush’s axis, instead we have two very serious threats to
U.S. national security and world stability, and J.M.H. aims to take them both
on.
The
threats identified in this two part piece are, possibly, far more frightening
than Islamic fundamentalist bent of global jihad, or rogue petrol states
seeking nukes…. For the threats offered up cut to the core of the American
economy, and have already begun to carry out the American dream.
A Slam Dunk
for Bipartisan Support
Of the two
threats, by the far the easiest one to target, politically, is China. For
Democrats, attacking this job draining succubus appeals directly to its core
constituency, unions and labor. By pegging the Yuan to the U.S.
dollar and exploiting a limitless labor pool of impoverished Chinese, China
literally exports its demographic problems and political unrest right onto
America’s shores; and it holds with an iron fist the U.S. dollars, utilized to
purchase China’s products. Otherwise, the Yuan, if allowed to float,
would naturally rise in value, making American products more affordable in the
global market. Therefore, the pegged Yuan, and the vast stores of U.S.
dollars retained, gives China an unfair trade advantage over U.S. products.
For
Republicans, taking on the People’s Republic of China harkens back to the days
when the G.O.P. nearly ruled the known U.S. political universe. For
inspiration, think of the glorious commie bashing days of Eisenhower, Nixon,
and Reagan! What could invigorate the Republican base more than
resurrecting the arch-nemesis of God, country, mom and apple pie? Who
said Reagan’s evil empire was defeated? Why it’s alive and well, and
kicking our economic ass; but not because of any superiority over American
labor or American ingenuity, but rather, because of unfair trade practices and
a U.S. government that has allowed this to happen.
Together,
Democrats and Republicans can unite to defeat an economic foe, for entirely
different political and ideological reasons.
Trade-o-lanche
In making our case, the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis provides
us with some cold hard facts:
Period
|
Balance
|
||
Total
|
Goods
|
Services
|
|
Annual
|
|||
1992
|
-39,212
|
-96,897
|
57,685
|
1993
|
-70,311
|
-132,451
|
62,141
|
1994
|
-98,493
|
-165,831
|
67,338
|
1995
|
-96,384
|
-174,170
|
77,786
|
1996
|
-104,065
|
-191,000
|
86,935
|
1997
|
-108,273
|
-198,428
|
90,155
|
1998
|
-166,140
|
-248,221
|
82,081
|
1999
|
-264,239
|
-336,310
|
72,072
|
2000
|
-378,780
|
-446,233
|
67,453
|
2001
|
-364,393
|
-421,980
|
57,586
|
2002
|
-420,524
|
-475,345
|
54,821
|
2003
|
-494,183
|
-541,544
|
47,361
|
2004
|
-609,345
|
-665,631
|
56,286
|
2005
|
-714,176
|
-783,801
|
69,625
|
2006
|
-759,240
|
-839,456
|
80,216
|
2007
|
-702,099
|
-823,192
|
121,093
|
2008
|
-698,802
|
-834,652
|
135,850
|
2009
|
-374,908
|
-506,944
|
132,036
|
From the
table: U.S. International Trade in Goods and Services: Exports, Imports and
Balances
We can
project from this table that the advocates of “free trade” have provided
America with trade deficits that, if left unchecked, could ramp up to a
trillion dollars, annually, very soon.
One sees
from the BEA’s figures that a whole lot of jobs are being exported outside the
United States.
We now
know there is nothing free about “free trade,” when it costs Americans jobs,
erodes the U.S. tax base, and leads to tremendous drain on our government, in
the form of social payments and unemployment insurance. “Free trade” also
directly feeds our national debt – by cutting America’s taxable income base and
increasing the aforementioned social service expenditures; and “free trade”
further feeds the U.S. jones for easy debt financing, both
private and public, as net Exporter countries send some U.S. dollars back to
America in the form of debt financing.
And the
single largest contributing nation to the U.S. trade deficit (?), well this
very same Bureau of Economics will tell you that would be China.
Slave Trade
To fight
this true force of evil, the U.S. should leverage its preeminence as a world
market to assist China in bringing about necessary societal reforms, so that
China can become a global market that aids America in driving the world
economy. As it stands now, an elite cadre of communist party leadership,
and a handful of crony capitalists, surfs a massive wave of Chinese
humanity that is exploited daily as inexpensive labor; moreover, this
leadership employs all, or nearly all, of the tools designed to curtail U.S.
exports to China: from tariffs and taxes to insisting that American business,
wishing to operate on China’s shores, partner with Chinese business.
In the
worker’s paradise, Chinese labor does not enjoy the basic social services or
safety net that Western democracies provide for its citizens; instead, the
average Chinese worker, operating in an economic gulag, is paid a
fraction of his American counterpart, and must save to provide for catastrophic
medical care, and retirement. So that by allowing China to carry on like
this, we not only do America and American labor a tremendous disservice, but we
allow Chinese leadership to continue to exploit nearly 20% of world’s
population for communist elite enrichment.
If the
Chinese government had any sense of morality at all, it would take some of
its profits, and foreign reserves, and invest them in setting up a social
safety net that would allow Chinese workers some semblance of dignity and
discretionary income. The result: a Chinese consumer society, and a self
sustaining market for China’s massive productive capacity, and a rising middle
class; of equal importance, it would take the monkey off America’s back to be
the engine of global economic consumption, help prevent global currency and
trade wars, and give the world’s exporters a new market with exceptional
potential.
The Fear
Card
China’s
Red Leadership is no hurry to adopt these reforms, for they like things the way
they are – with an elite fraction of society on top, reaping incredible
profits, and more than a billion citizens beneath them, operating at a near
sustenance level. Setting up a safety net for China’s population will,
undoubtedly, prove expensive in the short to intermediate run, as the cost of
China’s labor rises; but in the long run profits should soar, as China
transforms into a consumer society, and, ultimately, a preeminent world
market.
To be sure
some Western multi-nationals, of a manufacturing focus, may not like such an
economic and social transformation, as the rising cost of labor increases the
costs of goods sold, or erodes fat and rich profit margins on consumer
electronics and other products. Not to pick on Apple, whose products we
all know and love, but does this company really need to enjoy a greater than
50% profit margin on iPhone, courtesy of suicidal Chinese labor and the
predatory Chinese company, Foxconn?
No,
unfortunately, in order to assist China’s Red Aristocracy to move forward,
America is going to have to pull out every stop in the economic and political
play book to leverage China into doing the right thing. Trade sanctions
and taxes on Chinese imports are a great beginning. Labeling China a
currency manipulator is another step. Or worst case, by simply freezing
China’s imports out of the U.S. market, we tap into the communist party
leadership’s greatest fear: political and societal unrest.
If you
think the fat cats in Beijing and Hong Kong are tough, just think what hundreds
of millions of angry and hungry Chinese workers looks like moving en-masse.
And will
China actually dump its massive stockpiles of U.S. currency reserves, the
scenario U.S. leadership fears most? Not likely, for such an act will
only serve to devalue China’s own holdings, remove their leverage card, and
make American goods and services that much more competitive, globally.
The Long
March!
A myth has
sprung over the last couple of decades that China and the Chinese
government are this warm cuddly capitalist bear, who means the world no
harm. Mr. Alan Abelson, of Barron’s, a financial weekly, over the course of many Saturdays, has
eviscerated this fantasy that China is some sort of free market Disneyland,
when nothing could be further from the truth. Mr. Abelson’s weekly
editorial, Up & Down Wall Street, gives us a clearer picture (e.g. IPOs and stock market to the
contrary, the majority of China’s largest businesses remain under the control
and watchful eye of the state; the economic planning of this command economy,
and the infusion of funds into these large Chinese companies, is directed by
technocrats within the big red machine; and the captains of Chinese industry
who run these large companies work side by side with communist party cadres).
Chairmen
Mao wrote in 1935: "The
Long March is a manifesto. It has proclaimed to the world that the Red Army is
an army of heroes, while the imperialists and their running dogs, Chiang
Kai-shek and his like, are impotent. It has proclaimed their utter failure to
encircle, pursue, obstruct and intercept us. The Long March is also a
propaganda force. It has announced to some 200 million people in eleven
provinces that the road of the Red Army is their only road to liberation.”
Chinese
leadership today, under threat from few if any countries, seems to have chosen
a different path to “liberation,” one of crony capitalism and command economy;
but the world should make no mistake that China’s leadership remains on that
long march, even if it means a short run detour into faux capitalism. American
leadership has nothing to fear from an exploited and humble Chinese people, but
should be highly weary of the goals, ambitions and designs of China’s communist
party leadership, who appear bent on economic and political hegemony.
Perhaps a less sinister, but ultimately naïve read of the situation is: This
same leadership is just trying to stay one step ahead of 20% of the world’s
population?
This
blog’s greatest concern is that China has, for the last couple of decades,
lulled America into a sense of economic calm and a consumer opiate haze, as
U.S. jobs have been shipped overseas, and America and the American
government has become addicted to cheap debt financing. Meanwhile,
Federal deficits spiral out of control, from over consumption, lack of national
savings, and a shrinking tax base, and the need for ever increasing
unemployment benefits. And to what end (?): A weakened,
declining and debilitated United State of America.
Who also
benefits by a diminished manufacturing base within America? Why
that would be U.S. banks and the shadow banking industry, who have become one
of the larger employers in America, and who can in turn leverage this fact
against our own government to pay for Wall Street’s financial disasters.
“You will
never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious.”
Without
firing a shot, China, and in this country a band of free market zealots (like
some fifth column working its evil from within), has done more to harm and
damage America, economically, than the Red Army ever could have
done. Why merely check out this nation's unemployment and
underemployment rate of 20% or greater. Look no further than
Federal and State budgets and a government debt that is spiraling out of
control; and glance at the last gasps of Federal Reserve policy, with yet
another round of bank bailouts under the auspices of QE2, wearing the mask of
monetary stimulus.
To be sure
righting the balance of trade is not the answer to all of America’s economic
ills, but it’s a good start; and to be sure, China is not the only nation who
has exploited America’s “free trade” dogma for their
economic betterment.
But what
is absolutely sickening are the elites at the Chicago school of economics who
still tout this faded catechism as some absolute, when they are surrounded by
the decay “free trade” has wrought, in Cleveland, Pittsburgh and Detroit.
There is no such thing as utopian “free trade,” only wealthy industrialist
and manufacturers seeking out labor, tax and regulatory arbitrage, in order
to maximize profits (and governments who in turn profit, or lose, but nearly
always – at the expense of its people).
America’s
share of the world economy has shrunk over time, but approximately 24% of
global GDP still resides within U.S. borders, and we must leverage this fact in
establishing U.S. trade policy. We owe it to ourselves, and ultimately
for the betterment of the citizens of the world, to insist upon fair trade and
U.S. trade policies that mitigate the advantages of labor, regulatory and tax
arbitrage. It’s good for America and it forces some developing countries
to catch up with the American economy, by creating their own, internal,
markets to rely upon. Once these self sustaining markets are established
globally, in the so-called BRIC nations, and when the differences in tax codes,
regulation and the cost of labor are mitigated, then fair trade and the global
economy can take off as never before.
But until
then, the U.S. should insist upon fair and equitable trade from its global
partners, all the better to protect against predatory trade policies.
The True
Axis of Evil, Part II, coming soon.
Copyright JM Hamilton Publishing 2013