The Ultimate GOP Candidate has yet to Step Forward….
By J.M. Hamilton (1-8-12)
“Today we have a similar debate over this… anyone
know what this is… class? Anyone, anyone, anyone seen this before?… the
Laffer Curve. Anyone know what this says? It says at this point on
the revenue curve you will get exactly the same amount of revenue as at this
point. This is very controversial. Does anyone know what Vice
President George Bush called this in 1980? Anyone, Anyone?
Something D-O-O economics… voodoo economics.”
- Ben Stein from the movie, Ferris Bueller’s Day Off
Happy
New Year!
I
don’t get it. The GOP candidates are running around destroying each
other, trying to figure out who will lead them out of diaspora and back to the
White House. Debate after Republican debate only shows which leper has
the least spots (hopefully that’s not politically incorrect?)
Have
you ever seen such a fatally flawed crew?
The
only one in the mix with real gravitas, who could pose a serious challenge to
the incumbent, is the only one who hasn’t bubbled up as the monthly Republican
candidate du jour, that would be Mr. Huntsman.
Romney,who seems destined to get the nod, is going to become the “Bain” of private equity. Seriously, if you are an executive officer for TPG Capital,
Blackstone Group, KKR, Carlyle, or any number of private equity firms, you’ve
got to be pouring money into the campaign coffers of anybody other than Romney.
Why?
Because with a Romney nomination will come intense and withering scrutiny
of what private equity is and does: which is kill jobs; liquidate, flip
and merge companies; and increase the concentration of political power and
wealth in this country into fewer hands.
And
the real irony of a Romney nomination (?)… Evangelicals, who make up a
substantial percentage of the core Republican base, fear a new world order and
one world power. Evangelicals believe a one world power cabal is a sign
of the end times and the antichrist…. if I have that right. If that’s the
case imagine evangelical dismay when they learn that private equity is probably
one of the largest single contributors to globalization and the concentration
of power on the planet, aside from the Wall Street Cartel. Yep, the
likely Republican nominee, Mr. Romney, is the poster boy for private equity and
the concentration of economic, and hence, political power. President
Reagan was not a huge fan of concentrated power, by the way.
Separately,
just imagine the scrutiny Mr. Romney is going to bring to the “carried interest
tax?” A tax benefit that is near and dear to every private equity exec’s
heart.
Moving
right along… as much JMH finds the most interesting Republican candidate by
far, to be Ron Paul, he unfortunately carries with him some baggage; baggage
that afflicts many of his generation, and unfortunately successive generations,
as well. That people, and even political candidates, can grow, evolve,
and shed intolerance over time appears lost on many who rabidly oppose Mr.
Paul. Nevertheless, racism of any kind is a very serious charge,
rightfully so, and is likely to stick to his candidacy, even with earnest
disavowals. The real irony is that the twisted brother of racism, he goes
by the name of Religious Bigotry, would appear to be on full display with
another Republican candidate, Mr. Santorum; and yet, Religious Bigotry appears
more widely tolerated in Republican circles. J.M.H. is not the first to
write it, but it bears repeating…. at least a President Ron Paul would not seek
to legislate religious beliefs/morality from the White House (shucks, a
President Paul just might close up shop and sell the White House), while a
President Santorum would likely set up a theocracy, and a religious police
force that would make the Taliban pale in comparison.
As
this blog has suggested before Mr. Paul and his follower’s single biggest
contribution to this election cycle is to draw attention to just how similar
both parties, Republican and Democrat actually are, and how both parties are
addicted to big government. J.M.H. actually believes in the importance
of the U.S. government, but also acknowledges, as Mr. Paul does so well, that
our government often overextends its reach into our personal lives, through
incursions upon our civil rights, and globally, in the form of taxpayer funded
foreign adventures, aiding and abetting war profiteering, and nation building.
Mr.
Paul, personal failings aside, has a contribution to make to these upcoming
elections, that of providing competition to the duopoly that runs our country;
let’s hope he stays in the race, and starts a third party.
Which brings me finally to the uber Republican candidate… this man has out
“republicaned” the Republican party, by stealing their foreign policy thunder.
On foreign policy, he is second to none in protecting America from her
enemies. He hunted down and killed Osama bin Laden, and made significant
contributions to Dictator Gaddafi’s immolation (both were Republican targets).
He brought our troops home from that legacy catastrophe of a war in Iraq
– handed down to him from the Bush administration; and this individual has
plans to exit Afghanistan.
This
gentlemen has shown international leadership and the path to how America can
enlist allies, and not go it alone, in Libya, a preferred model for future
martial efforts; and he has also shown us how 21st century military engagements
can often be handled with technology, manless drones, and lightening quick
raids. He has almost made Al Qaeda leadership extinct. And he is
the process of stream lining the DOD to fit our national interest and budget.
On foreign policy, President Obama makes the prior Republican
administration look like amateur hour, and I would suggest to my readers that
no current Republican candidate could step into his shoes and do as well.
And
like prior Republican administrations, President Obama has kept strong ties to
our ally in the middle-east, Israel. As quoted in the Washington Post,
Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel had the following to say about the President’s
commitment: “As I listened to the president’s
speech on the Middle East, I heard him reaffirm his strong commitment to
Israel’s safety, security and prosperity.”
On
domestic policy, corporations have never been richer, profit margins are high,
and balance sheets – in many instances – are rich with cash. Fed policy
under the President’s watch has been very generous to: the wealthy, Wall Street
Banks, and multi-national corporations. As for the Wall Street bail-out,
again, this was a legacy project – initiated – by the Bush administration and
Mr. Henry Paulson. How this President handles the next, and inevitable,
financial crisis remains to be seen; Mr. Obama’s administration will own the next
crisis.
And
while jobs are scarce – how much of this present economic environment is
created by the plutocracy, via capital strikes, globalization, and unfair trade
agreements? These are issues that could be addressed, if the nation had
a fully functioning Republican Congress that was interested in helping out the
American economy, instead of holding same hostage for prospective political
gain. Unlike a President Romney, whose economic policies call for
“borrowing and spending” as reported by Bloomberg last week, President
Obama is more fiscally conservative and would prefer to pay as we go through a
combination of spending cuts and tax increases.
President Obama does not appear to believe in what
former President H.W. Bush referred to as “voodoo economics.” He’s a
pragmatic man and probably understands that politicians/congress doesn’t have
the self- discipline to increase taxes in good economic times, which is the
Keynesian paradigm’s shortcoming.
The
argument I’m clumsily attempting to make is that, in essence, a moderate
Republican already occupies the White House, and that by the standards of a
H.W. Bush, or say, either an Eisenhower or Nixon, Obama should be the
Republican nominee. It is because the zealots within the Republican Party
have moved the political center of this nation so far right, as to be rendered
unrecognizable to many establishment Republicans from yester-year, that we have
such a conservative and pro-business Democratic administration.
What
this says for the economic and political aspirations of Democrats and Liberals
is another story. If I didn’t know better, it’s almost as if the
plutocracy installed into the White House a Trojan Republican President,
wrapped in the Democratic Party’s mantle. It is because President Obama
is the calmest, most rational, and most presidential choice, versus the
Republican field of candidates, that J.M.H. supports him for a return to the
White House. Besides, the nation hasn’t had a foreign policy guru
in the White House this gifted, since Nixon/Kissinger teamed up to conquer the
world.
Copyright JM Hamilton Publishing 2013
No comments:
Post a Comment