Sunday, January 12, 2014

The Last of the Neocons…?


The Last of the Neocons…?

“I never doubted Obama’s support for the troops, only his support for their mission,” Gates writes.

By J.M. Hamilton (1-12-14)

Before Mr. Gates, and his new book, Duty, becomes a footnote in history, we should take a moment to recognize the hubris surrounding a passing tribe of faux-warriors, known as the neocons.  They have not gone gently into that good night, and arguably have helped bankrupt the nation in two pointless nation building exercises, during the last decade:  Iraq and Afghanistan.  With thousands of U.S. war dead, and trillions in U.S. dollars wasted, the neocons still believe that America should rule the world, and that there is no problem on earth that can’t be solved with a predator drone, by spying on America and the world, or an amphibious assault.  The neocon thought process can be best characterized as:  shoot and spy first, and think of an exit strategy later, but only after a long and costly nation building exercise fails, yet again. 

It appears completely lost on neocons, the ability to learn from history and prior failed nation building exercises, such as Vietnam.  Then again, the neocon – wrapped in the flag and patriotic language – really aren’t about spreading democracy, freedom and liberation, or even protecting America; but rather, I am absolutely convinced, many of this tribe are more interested in seeing the stock value of the defense industry, like Halliburton, soar. 


I’ve always had a special empathy for the men and women who serve this country; the demographics on the enlisted ranks would undoubtedly show that many of our troops come from very humble means and beginnings, much like my father.  My dad joined the U.S.A.F.’ enlisted ranks, as America entered into Vietnam.  It was his way of avoiding the draft, by joining the branch of the military least likely to see combat.  He rose up through the enlisted ranks, obtained a college degree through the GI bill, went to officers training school, and rose up through the officer ranks all over again, obtaining the rank of colonel before retiring.  That Wisconsin farm boy did all right for himself.  Always very frugal and generally good with investments, he died a paper millionaire in 2001, at the age of 58.  Dad, of Prussian patrimony, dressed up well in public and on the base, but in private, was a little high strung.  I guess thirty-five years of active duty service – during the height of the cold-war - will put an edge on just about any soldier. 

Former Secretary of Defense, Mr. Gates, was often portrayed as the model of civility, but in his new book he explodes and rages at President Obama for his failure to believe in the war in Afghanistan, and in particular, the parade of cheerleaders for that war, known at the joint chiefs and the respective heads of command for those two wars.  Seems that President Obama has read his history, and apparently knows that dealing with a highly corrupt regime in Afghanistan, in a narco-terrorist state, is going to end very badly for America.  Afghanistan is known as the graveyard of empires, just ask the British, or more recently, the Russians.

Living under my dad’s command for the first 21 years of my life, like many military brats, I felt like – to a far lesser degree - I served, too.  For while I remember many aspects of my childhood fondly, underneath the veneer of the American dream was some dysfunction… not unlike the military industrial and intelligence complex (MIIC) today.  The MIIC, and our intelligence community, with redundant branches, redundant weapons systems and departments, billions in cost over runs, outdated weapons systems geared for the last war, and always conveniently dubious accounting, consumes half the Federal budget’s discretionary spending.  In fact, at their height, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan grew so expensive that their budget went offline or outside the U.S. Federal budget. (Note: The Pentagon has not been audited accurately in two decades.)

And if a President Romney had had his way, like the locusts in private equity, the MIIC budget would have consumed even more.

Fortunately for the men and women who serve, and all Americans, neocons, like Mr. Gates, and an adventurist foreign policy, much like the dinosaur, seems to be a passing thing.  Liz Cheney and her recent political campaign provides us with another example.  Like her famous father, Ms. Cheney campaigned in the Wyoming U.S. Senate race, among other things, for greater military spending, more failed nation building, and unlike her famous father - trashed her lesbian-sister; and then, quietly withdrew this week from her race, now that the writing was on the wall.  Her campaign was doomed.

Ms. Cheney, Mr. Gates, nor the neocons, however, never mentioned the direct counterpoint to their guns and butter trade off: which is the U.S. spends more than the G-20 combined on defense and intel, and one in four U.S. children are born into poverty.  And the nation is fed up and war weary.  Neocons also conveniently, fail to mention that the only thing that is keeping this country afloat, and her creditors at bay, is the Federal Reserve, which has been printing $85 billion a month (to pay for the MIC and the NSA, and so as to cover the costs of our nation’s debt service load).  Fortunately, the lessons Mr. Gates and the neocons taught us have been hammered home, and at least for another generation, it looks like we’ll follow the admonishment of President Washington in his farewell address to the nation: Beware of foreign entanglements.

Far greater lessons, however, are also on full display.  The first being that war is big business.  Ask private equity’s Carlyle group, who has a large financial interest in making sure that the NSA continues to spy on Americans.  To insure that America stays on a war footing, and the American government continues to operate in private equity’s interests, that of raping and pillaging the American dream, PE is now buying out the military brass, and apparently, the U.S. government.  The second lesson is that the U.S. acts as the world’s policeman, not to protect America, but to protect trade routes and multi-national’s economic interests throughout the world.  Ask former German President, Horst Kohler.  If the MIIC was really about protecting America and her borders, it could do so on a far smaller budget than it presently consumes, but that wouldn’t prove profitable to Halliburton, Carlyle, and McDonnell Douglas, et al.

And the third and final lesson is that until the costs of war, nation building, and policing the world, are spread among it’s true beneficiaries, U.S. citizens will find themselves drawn into endless conflicts.  Until Sovereign nations – often oil rich monarchies, and multi-nationals – many of whom have made record profits, recently, and have mountains of cash on their balance sheets – pay for war, instead of U.S. taxpayers, than there will always be cheerleaders and neocons advocating for war.  Those cheerleaders will often be: the MIIC itself; politicians – many of whom have never seen combat; sovereign nations- with nothing at stake; and commercial interests- who often make it part of their fiduciary responsibility to avoid paying taxes.

The irony in all this... is that most neocons hail from the party of Reagan and Eisenhower.  Mr. Reagan who defeated the Soviet Union w/out ever firing a shot in anger, and President Eisenhower, who originally warned the nation about the MIIC.

President Obama, to his credit, is not buying what the cheerleaders, Mr. Gates and the neocons, are selling, and has not engaged the U.S. militarily in the world’s latest debacle, Syria.  Perhaps the lessons America has learned over time will stick?  And the nation will listen to another Founding father’s admonishment: 

"Of all the enemies to public liberty war is, perhaps, the most to be dreaded, because it comprises and develops the germ of every other. War is the parent of armies; from these proceed debts and taxes; and armies, and debts, and taxes are the known instruments for bringing the many under the domination of the few."

 - President Madison

But who am I kidding, jingoist and war profiteers will always be around.  For as Plato was said to observe, “Only the dead have seen the end of war.”

Copyright JM Hamilton Publishing 2014

Saturday, January 4, 2014

The Revolving Door Spins for Private Equity


The Revolving Door Spins for Private Equity

“Happy New Year”

By J.M. Hamilton (1-4-14)

What could motivate General Alexander, the present head of the NSA, to defend spying on U.S. citizens for no good reason?  The results of this spying are said to be highly questionable at best, and have now been all but declared unconstitutional by one or more Federal Judges.  A key motivating factor may be that the General is preparing to retire this Spring, and almost certainly a very financially rewarding private sector career awaits him.

Seventy percent of NSA activity is farmed out to the private sector, much of it to Booz Allen - Mr. Snowden's former employer - which is owned by private equity's Carlyle Group.  Clearly, Carlyle has a vested interest in maintaining the NSA spy apparatus that has done so much damage to U.S. world standing, and many multi-nationals global income statements.  

If I was a betting man, I'd wager that Mr. Alexander is on his way to highly lucrative career at the Carlyle Group, or one of it's subsidiaries, as a rich reward for defending the spy agency - and the billions in private sector contracts the NSA throws off.

Of course, in the last Presidential election much was made of Candidate Romney's ties to private equity, and attacks from candidates from both political parties were almost sanguinary -and quite outspoken- about the industry.  It's been written that up to fifty percent of the bankruptcies that occurred on the heals of the 2008 financial crisis were directly attributable to the highly leveraged balance sheets, caused by current or prior private equity ownership.  Private equity is notorious for leveraging up companies -to pay PE executives rich rewards- and laying off workers as a means to pay down said debt; PE undoubtedly is a proponent of tax, labor, and regulatory arbitrage wearing the mask of "free trade agreements," and is a huge driver in globalization/outsourcing, both of which have a debilitating impact upon U.S. job creation and further inflame decades long U. S. wage stagnation.  Private Equity enjoys numerous tax advantages not the least of which is carried interest - which is subsidized by the remnants of the U.S. middle-class, who pay at a much higher tax rate.

General Alexander would not be the first high profile government employee, who ran directly into the arms of private equity, post-government career.  Several former U.S. Treasury Secretaries either worked for, directly or indirectly, Private Equity firms, prior to or after leaving their treasury post.  Former Treasury Secretary Geithner is just the most recent example.  It's interesting to note that rather joining the banking industry many of the nation's recent former Treasury Secretaries instead found their way to private equity (PE).  Is it a surprise?  Certainly many of Mr. Geithner's policies at Treasury, from TARP - et al. to advocacy of the Fed's quantitative easing and interest rate suppression, directly benefited PE, immensely.

The debilitating impact the PE industry has on businesses and their viability, the labor force, the economy, and even the government.... Seems completely lost on many government officials.  Many of whom hit the turnstile running for the quick riches that await on the other side, most often riches produced at the expense of the nation and her people.  Democrat or Republican, none are immune to PE's siren song; and since the election both parties have gone completely silent on the topic and the many issues surrounding PE.

Can PE and its highly deleterious impact upon the economy be reined in?  

Absolutely.  

For starters carried interest, and associated PE tax dodges should be eliminated, so the American taxpayer does not continue to subsidize an industry that operates at cross purposes with society's interests.  The amount of debt that take over targets could be saddled with, so that companies are better able to withstand the next inevitable recession w/out going bankrupt, could be capped as a ratio of total assets, or by some measure of ability to service debt load.  The capping of debt might set limits on PE executive payouts but the trade off is a financially healthier company able to withstand economic shocks, and preserve jobs and the tax base.  The government could also set caps on shipping jobs offshore, globalization, and outsourcing, as a means to pay down the highly leveraged debt.  And finally, the Sherman Antitrust Act could and should be enforced to curtail the formation of, and encourage the break up of existing, monopolies and cartels that are often a result of private equity, and banking cartel, driven M&A activity, combinations, and bankruptcies.  Monopolies and cartels -created by private equity - kill jobs, harm the tax base, crush innovation, are anti-consumer, make monopolistic profits that are a hidden tax on society, and curtail greatly stock and alternative investment opportunities as a result of eliminating competition.

Meanwhile, while the nation suffers in year five of the Great Recession, one private equity executive referred to the earnings and refinancing afforded to the PE industry as "biblical."

Liberals often receive a bum rap for being anti-business or allegedly, being against free markets; but assuredly, there is nothing pro-business or pro-free market about private equity created bankruptcies, or monopolies and cartels. 

The recent trend towards democratic populism in our society is not driven by a demand for egalitarian outcomes but rather, it is driven by society's need for egalitarian opportunities.  Private Equity, in its present incarnation, crushes opportunity.  In short, private equity and crony capitalism must be reined in so as to not reward an elite few, but instead create opportunity and rising wages for all, including the elite few.

Even under reined in circumstances, the rich would continue to grow richer, but PE's impact upon society, government, the economy and opportunity would be muted.  And that's a good thing.

Republicans were correct to attack private equity in the last election; however, the problems created by PE did not simply vanish because the election cycle ended.  Instead, they are alive and well and staring down the nation.

Copyright JM Hamilton Publishing 2014

Saturday, December 21, 2013

A Stain on Massachusetts


A Stain on Massachusetts

Or the Top Fifty Lessons Learned from Plymouth County Probate... 

"In general, the powerful and influential in our society shape the laws and have great influence on the legislature or the Congress.  This creates a reluctance to change because the powerful and the influential have carved out for themselves or have inherited a privileged position in our society, of wealth and social prominence or higher education or opportunity for the future.  What can we still do to restore equity and justice or to preserve it or to enhance it in this society?"    


By J.M. Hamilton  12-25-13

After a thirteen year child custody battle, and more than a half million spent on legal fees and child support, here's what I have learned about the Massachusetts Probate Courts (specifically in Plymouth County):

1)  If you nine year old comes to you and asks if you, " Is mommy  trying to kill me (?)," if you're a caring father, your life is about to be turned upside down.

2)  Further supporting the medical evidence showing inexplicable weight loss, your son can  black out in front of the school twice, and in front of an entire church congregation as an Altar Boy, due to lack of proper nutrition, and the Judge won't do a damn thing.

3)  A mother can underfeed her nine year old, as documented by medical records, to the tune of fifteen pounds, and she will not be held accountable by the Plymouth County Probate courts, particularly Judge Menno.

4)  A mother can lock her son out of her home, at least three times that I'm aware of, and she will not be held accountable by the Plymouth County Probate courts (aka Judge Menno).

5)  A mother can under-cloth her son, so that he is sick for six consecutive weeks in the dead of a Massachusetts winter, and the Plymouth County Probate Courts will not grant a change in custody.

6)  You can present pictures of yours son's bleeding hands, as a result of exposure, and the professionals and the judge will dismiss the evidence as a "rash."

7)  The mother can abuse pets and animals, and in some instances make them disappear over the course of a weekend, and the Court appointed psychiatrist, Dr. Wolman (Boston), will dismiss this, as "improbable."

8)  Mom can remarry, and bring into your son's life a stepson, who abuses your son, beats on him, and has a rap sheet on Google the length of your arm, and the Plymouth County Probate court doesn't care.

8.3)  Mom can call your son an "idiot" and "hyper, “and drag him from professional doctor to psychiatrist in the effort to have him diagnosed with ADD, ADHD, or the childhood disorder de jour - Autism, all throughout your son's elementary school years (with every doctor repeating that there is ‘not a problem’); and when your son turns out to  be the straight A student - in his middle school years-  you maintained your son would always be, the Judge Menno will give your Ex full credit.

8.5)  If you think your Ex has Munchhausens syndrome, because she squanders $33,000 in child support on attorneys and doctors -annually, and your son asks you why he is "poor," you are probably right, she does have Munchhausens.

8.7)  If your son misses thirty-one homework assignments, and your Ex might be a teacher within the Marshfield school district, the school administration, and the Plymouth County probate Judge Menno will give mommy a passing grade.

9)  Your son can be suicidal, under the care of his mother, for the duration of an entire Summer, and the Plymouth County Probate court will NOT grant a change of custody, but they'll blame the father.

10)  If your Ex is smart, she'll hire the local State Rep, Jim Cantwell, who has come out of retirement from his law practice, to represent her.

11)  It will be painfully clear to everyone in the courtroom why the State Rep. Jim Cantwell retired from the practice of law, and went into the politics; and yet, he will prevail because cronyism, politics and corruption trumps the rule of law and prima facie evidence in Plymouth County, Massachusetts.

12)  A prominent Boston attorney, Sandy Durland III, told me that my Ex had underfed my son, by sending him to bed without dinner – over the span of weeks.

13)  Judge Menno will see to it that only long established "friends/cronies" of the court are appointed to the key roles of parenting coordinator and guardian ad litem (i.e. court appointed investigator).

14)  The courtroom proceedings are a charade, the real decision making goes on in the star chamber within the judge's office.

15)  A "parenting coordinator," Attorney Michele Dorsey (Scituate MA), is a surrogate for the court, and has the "ex-officio" powers of a judge, w/out being required to practice the rule of law or due process.  Avoid the hiring of a parenting coordinator at all costs.

16)  If there is an obvious conflict of interest and you have signed a mediation agreement with a Plymouth County attorney, and this same attorney, Michele Dorsey (Scituate, MA) is dispensing legal advice to the mother in this case..... the Plymouth County probate judge, Menno, will still appoint this same attorney as a surrogate to his court, and assign her to be a "parenting coordinator."

17)  When you point out the obvious ethical issues of the Judge's parenting coordinator appointment to the Massachusetts Bar, they will side with the Judge Menno's decision; that is to say, your Ex's attorney/mediator/court appointed parenting coordinator, Michele Dorsey.

18)  If the parenting coordinator divides the payment of her fees in a disproportionate manner, say 70% father/30% mother.... BEWARE!   Your former spouse has absolutely no incentive to work things out with you; but rather, has every incentive to drag you before the parenting coordinator on every single issue, monthly.

19)  The parenting coordinator (PC), Michele Dorsey (Scituate MA) will not rein this behavior in, because after all, she is being paid, every time your Ex drags you into another meeting with her.

20)  You and your son are "scrod," when the parenting coordinator is meeting with your Ex on the side, via phone and personal meetings.  Ignore the fact - at your peril - that you are being charged for these meetings, which you are not a part of, and when you ask for information or records concerning these meetings - you are denied.

21)  The divorce rates in the country is 50% for first time marriages and higher for second marriages.  If you have children, there is a higher probability than not that your divorce will not be amicable and that you will end up going through a probate court.

22)  Probate courts have some of the broadest powers of any other court in the land, that is to say, discretionary, arbitrary, and capricious power. These probate court powers are inimical to the rule of law and are likely unconstitutional, as they deprive persons of property, liberty, and the right to freely associate with family.

23)  Family law attorneys do not work on Fridays, and they take off the month of August, along with the Plymouth County Probate Court - Judge Menno - even if your son is suicidal while under his mother's care.

24)  If you are looking for a Hollywood ending to your court room proceedings, where truth and facts triumph over local politics and cronyism, particularly in Plymouth County, Massachusetts, well... forget about it.

25)  When you report your Ex to DCF - the Marshfield Independent School District Principal, Mrs. Hubbard, will lie and cover up for your Ex, even though you've just been chewed out by this same school administration because your son missed 31 homework assignments, and are told your son is having a terrible year - while under mommy's care.

26)  When you tell the District school Superintendent, Mr. Scott Borstel, that the principal lied to DCF - the Superintendent will "conduct an investigation" and tell you it was okay that she lied.


28). The GAL, Dr. Wolman, will threaten your son if he asks to live with his father.

29). The GAL, Dr. Wolman (Boston) will tell the mother it is okay for her to conduct her own personal investigation on the father's property in the middle of a trial.


31). Despite all the horrific acts your Ex has committed against your son, the GAL will say the key point in the trial is when you filed a restraining order against the mother for conducting an investigation on your property.

32). Everyone acknowledges the obvious double-standard: that had I conducted an investigation on mother's property I would be arrested or worse, shot.

33).  Your son's doctor in Pembroke, MA, Dr. Stanley, can lie about your son's weight loss, alter medical records, and the Massachusetts board of medicine will not hold your son's doctor accountable.  This Dr. Stanley will lie and say your son must have had "rocks in his pockets" to account for the fifteen pound weight loss.

34). When any of the professionals involved in this case say they are looking out for the interests of your son, you know some highly self-serving SH!T is about to come down.

35). The stated goal of he State Rep, Jim Cantwell, was to drag these proceedings out for three years -completely contrary to the interests of my son, and against the ethical rules governing attorneys in the State of Massachusetts.

36). After four years in the Plymouth County probate court, I'm completely convinced the goal of the probate Judge Menno was to keep you tied up in his courtroom so that you generate fees for the local counsel, therapist and psychiatrist.

37). The Psychiatric profession is under fire in this country as President Obama's appointee - and the lead psychiatrist - has pointed out that the profession and the DSM is not backed by science or biology.  In short, the profession is a fraud.

38). If you witness child abuse and the beating of children at a scouting event in Marshfield , MA --- don't report it to the parenting coordinator, Michele Dorsey, Judge Menno, the Boy Scouts, or the GAL, Dr. Wolman (Boston) because they will not investigate it and you will pay the price for reporting same.

39). Doctors, lawyers, teachers, parenting coordinators, mediators, school principals.... Apparently, nobody is a "mandated court reporter" in Plymouth County, w/ no obligation to report child abuse.

40). Some Marshfield parents still believe it is acceptable to hit, beat and strangle their children.

41). When I found out my son was suicidal under the care of his mother, and the professionals in this case continued to do nothing, I published a blog about my experiences with the Plymouth County Probate court.

42). After the trial was over, I wrote a book entitled Mrs. Marshfield, which was written largely based upon actual court room testimony and court room evidence.  I believe the book should be required reading for any parents with children, considering divorce, or any parents considering having children within the institution of marriage.

43) Judge Menno ruled that I had a first amendment right to publish the book; however, as he deemed the book to be harmful to my son - he suspended visitation for over a year.

44). To date, no medical or psychiatric evidence has been presented that my son ever saw the book or was in any way harmed by the book.  In fact my son is thriving and a straight A student.... exactly as I foretold.

45). The parties enraged by the book, Mrs. Marshfield, are the cadre of "professionals" who make up the probate industrial complex; that is to say, the star chamber.

46). In Fall 2013, the judge also reasoned that since I did not continue to litigate in his courtroom, I did not deserve to see my son.  The definition of insanity is for my family to attempt and continue to litigate in Plymouth County Probate.

47). Judge Menno conveniently forgot that my State Senator had requested that this same judge, Menno, be investigated, which resulted in an investigation spanning over six months, and I had asked the judge to recuse himself.


49). The same prominent Boston attorney, Mr. Sandy Durland III, who told me that my Ex systematically underfed my son, also told me that the judge in this case used to be competent but that he now took shortcuts with the law to reach his desired outcome.  This prominent Boston attorney is the brother in law of the State Rep, Jim Cantwell, who represented my Ex.  I guess he would know.

50). The behavior of Judge Menno and the professionals in this case is arguably criminal, likely unconstitutional; but like some of the more unsavory actions and recent revelations of the NSA, may be possibly legal and permitted by law.  At least for now.


Back in 1974, Jimmy Carter, then Governor Carter, gave a famous speech at the University of Georgia attacking our corrupt legal system, dominated by legal elites, the rich and the powerful.  Today, little has changed and it probably has grown worse.  Lady justice has lifted her blindfold, and with a wink and a nod, her scales of justice have been piled high with loot and tilted in favor of the elite and backroom/crony dealings.  The two trials that I have been a part of in Plymouth County were little more than playacting.

The majority of our judges are not elected in this country but are appointed for life, which essentially means their power is nearly absolute.  Absolute power corrupts absolutely, just as we saw in this case.  And the war of attrition and endless delays-that is often the core strategy of our modern day courts- perverts justice at every turn.  That, and it is widely known that justice is all too often for sale in this country.

"Justice delayed is justice denied."  Mr. Gladstone told us that.

Our family law courts damage, and in some instances, destroy young lives, as many lawyers and many professionals play their games and take money away from families that can ill afford to pay or play their game.  The Plymouth County Probate court is a stain on the State of Massachusetts, and state bureaus and boards responsible for overseeing the “professionals” further damage the state's reputation.  I believe there is a special place in hell for medical and psychiatric professionals, teachers and judges who abuse, and/or aid and abet, the manipulation of children.  It's the tenth ring of hell or Plymouth County Probate by any other name.

Ultimately, as we live in a democracy - Americans get the government we deserve; that is to say, as long as we tolerate tenured judges and politicians, a crony system of elites running our courts and government for their own personal enrichment - U.S. citizens should expect to be preyed upon and sustain continued injustice on a monumental scale.... especially at the expense of our children.

As for myself, I have never missed a support payment, never missed a scheduled visitation, remained gainfully employed for in excess of thirty years, have no criminal record, and have never entered rehab for the abuse of drugs; and I am eminently better able to provide and afford a better life and care for my son, than the current circumstances my son finds himself consigned to.

While I am not going to publish the names of the individuals involved in this case - for fear of the continued abuse of power and reprisals against me and my son - I am publishing the docket numbers, which are a matter of public record.  Perhaps some enterprising reporter, or lawyer or a politician with a conscience, would like to take a look at the corruption within the Plymouth County Probate court?

Should you visit Plymouth County Probate, please send the Judges my warmest regards.


Docket Number:  PL02D 1047-DR
Docket Number:  PL02D 1047-FM1

Copyright JM Hamilton Publishing 2013

Saturday, December 7, 2013

Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely


Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely

By J.M. Hamilton 12-8-13

Sorry.  I was away for a while: Fighting the State, and surprise, the State won.  That story however, about the fabulously corrupt State of Massachusetts’ Probate System, we will save for another day, when I can give the topic the full treatment and attention it deserves.

In keeping with theme of government, and unchecked government power, corruption, malfeasance, and fraud…. We launch into this week’s piece. 

Liberals and progressives look to the State to provide solutions that go unaddressed by the private sector, to the smooth out the rough anti-humanist edges of capitalism, and to set the rules of the road for our “free-market system.”  The GOP in its present incarnation does everything in its power to obstruct government, play upon America's fears of big government, and pass legislation providing government largess to the 1%.  In short, the GOP hates government, unless it handing out welfare to it core constituency, the plutocracy.  As such, as this blog has foretold, the GOP would appear doomed, unless it learns to embrace the middle-class, becomes more tolerant and inclusive, and dumps the septuagenarian and octogenarian radicals who make up its current base.

This piece is not about bashing the GOP, but rather, it’s about challenging liberals and populist democrats, who often have the reflexive reaction to defend anything the government or Democratic Party does.  The political pendulum is just beginning to swing left, finally and again, in this country; and even the major corporations can see the writing on the wall.  Unlike the GOP, their corporate sponsors cannot afford to live in a world of fantasy, and must plan for the future, witness Exxon’s acknowledgement of global warming and the inevitability of taxes on carbon.
As the pendulum begins to angle left, demographic trends pull away from GOP policies, and jobs continue to run scarce because our government’s official policy favors free trade agreements and globalization that are inimical to U.S. job creation, the citizens of the United States are increasingly looking for government to fill the void/vacuum left behind by our crony capitalist system, and an economy dominated by cartels and monopolies. 

Now more than ever, Dems, Liberals and Progressives must hold all branches of government, it’s bureaus and bureaucracies, and government contractors accountable.  Failure to hold government and politicians accountable will ultimately mean that just as the political pendulum is presently swinging Left (beyond the reach of today’s GOP, indeed even past Clintonian Democrats, who support monopolistic and cartel run economic sectors), it will turn back even more sharply and rapidly - Right.   All of this is to say, the worst tendencies of the Party in power tend to materialize, once power is obtained.  Witness the creation of Romneycare by a Democratic administration, at the Federal level, at a time of record unemployment in this country, circa 2008; or witness President Bush (W)/Mr. Cheney starting up two major wars, with dubious results and specious national security claims, in the last decade, with their crippling and debilitating impact upon the Federal budget and our military.

Tenured politicians and tenured judges, in short, unchecked power…. As often as not, have a deleterious impact upon good government, because they are vested in: maintaining the status quo; handing out government largess to wealthy campaign contributors, prospective clients and future employers; and have no incentive to run government efficiently, effectively, and for the betterment of the 99%.  Absolutely critical then to good government and good democracy, are term limits on all politicians and all judges, limits on campaign contributions and fund raising, and limits on the duration of the political/campaign season.  These reforms would not challenge free speech or political debate, but rather, enhance them.  Progressives and liberals should champion term limits and campaign finance reform as the cornerstone of good government.  Transparency too, is absolutely critical to the ideals of good government, and here, neither party has done a good job of supporting this cause.  Some of the worst excesses in government, under a Democratic administration, which ran on a campaign of greater transparency, have occurred because of a total lack of transparency, accountability, and a fount of misinformation, if not outright lies, surrounding certain government programs and agencies.  

Two recent examples come immediately to mind:  Romney/Obama-Care, and the NSA.  The failure of the government on the rollout of new medical care program is hard to conceive when one considers the technological prowess of the U.S., and the Democratic Party’s political links to the Silicon Valley and the technological sector (and the failure gave additional fuel and fodder to the GOP and America’s innate fear of big government).  As such, it’s not Republicans who should be hammering the Administration, but rather, Progressives themselves, who should be leading the charge to correct this colossal blunder.  Agency/Administration heads should have been terminated, tenured government employees demoted, and if necessary, private sector contractors brought in to see the job through, or to further enhance the efforts of same.

The revelations about an opaque and disingenuous NSA have been equally damaging and damning to Progressive efforts to champion good government, and only served to further deepen the majority of Americans distrust.  Not only has the NSA damaged the U.S. internationally, in terms of relations with its allies and pending trade agreements, but it has revealed for the all the world to see U.S. hypocrisy.  That is, the champion of freedom, democracy, and liberal values, spies on its citizens 24/7, preconceived notions of privacy are shredded, and the surveillance state is flirting with totalitarianism on a scale that would of heretofore been unimaginable.

By way of quick digression, it’s interesting to note that Nations and democracies, sometimes have an awful way adopting some of the worst characteristics of their enemies over time.  Benny Morris, an Israeli citizen and a champion of Zionism, and the author of Righteous Victims, noted that the State of Israel had adopted some of the worst attributes and methods of the European countries Jews fled, in the persecution, occupation and containment of Palestinian citizens.  In this country, after the U.S. fought WWII to eliminate an authoritarian thug, and fought a multi-decade cold war to eliminate a totalitarian cancer of global import… the U.S. increasingly seems to be adopting some of the worst characteristics and policies of the Stasi and the KGB.  Even uber hawk, Senator Mc Cain believes General Alexander should beat it, "resign or be fired."

It’s not just our world standing, however, that is taking a hit, but multi-nationals in the technological sector are paying a dear financial price for expressly, or tacitly, allowing the NSA to use them as a tool to spy upon Americans, indeed all citizens of the world.  The hit to their bottom line will not only be domestic in nature, but almost certainly international in scope, with new entrants in the market place to help insure the privacy of internet users and social networking sites.  Let’s not shed too many tears for our internet, telecommunications, and social network providers (almost all of whom are monopolies).  Heh, you lay in bed with the devil, and your bound to suffer physically, mentally, spiritually and financially; but we’ll leave analogies between the NSA and my first marriage out of this, at least for now.

Among the key questions are: why did it take Mr. Snowden and Ms. Manning to the blow the whistle, before Senator Feinstein – recalling her liberal and freedom championing credentials – demanded an investigation into NSA activities?  Senator Feinstein should have been way out in front of this issue years ago, but she’s long been a champion of the MIC, surveillance, and unfettered government spending on same.  As such, the Democratic Senator from California is about as right-wing as they come.  This is a classic example of where the terms limits imposed upon the executive branch, would work wonders within the U.S. Senate.  But why stop there?  Perhaps Progressives should champion true government reform, and government cost containment, by supporting an Amendment to the Constitution establishing an unicameral government, and dispensing with the gerrymandered House of Representatives, altogether.  If it works in Nebraska, why not Washington D.C.?

This of course, leads us past this President, who all the sudden has gotten on board - albeit a little late - with the populist trend in Democratic politics.  The next President will almost assuredly be from the Democratic Party, despite the Party’s fumbling of the ball on healthcare reform.  The question we have to ask ourselves leading up to 2016 is do we want more of the same, in the form of the ultimate insider, Ms. Clinton, or do want somebody who will champion the middle-class and American values of honesty, truth and transparency, in the incarnation of Senator Elizabeth Warren?


Not everything that comes from Massachusetts is veiled in lies and half-truths… Ms. Warren is proof of that, and she would make an outstanding President.  Ms. Warren would restore our standing in the world, and she – more so than any other candidate – would do a great deal to rein in the worst excesses of government agencies and private sector cartels, both of which often crush freedom, democracy, and the American ideal at nearly every turn.
Every government dollar that progressives and liberals see wasted, or that goes uncollected in the form of tax dodges, is a dollar that could be spent on our children, paying down the national debt, or afforded to future generations.

Copyright JM Hamilton Publishing 2013