Saturday, September 17, 2016

Symphony of Debt & Destruction


Symphony of Debt & Destruction


“We’re not in a stable equilibrium,” Greenspan said. “I hope we can all find a way out because this is too great a country to be undermined, by how should I say it, crazies.”


By J.M. Hamilton (9-17-2016)

Perhaps Mr. Greenspan should observe the old saw, “Those who live in glass houses…” 

After all, what’s crazy?  Living under the delusion that the Federal Reserve, under one’s watch, played a small role in the worst economic calamity, so far, in the twenty-first century?   Yes, the Maestro had just left the conductor’s stand, while the music played, the Fed fiddled, and Wall Street burned the country’s 2008 economy to the ground.

But heh, the elite tell us we are not supposed to talk about such things.  Shame on Mr. Trump for bringing up the “Federal Reserve” topic.  Apostasy?  Sacrilege against the high priests of finance, many of whom Senator Warren says should be jailed.
 
Doesn’t Mr. Trump know that the elite never talk about the fourth branch of government, and the most powerful branch of government, at that?

Personally – for me, The Donald waffles too much.  Add in xenophobia, bigotry among his following, intolerance, and Mr. Trump is a non-starter in my book.  And yet, he continues to rise in the polls.  Warts aside, Mr. Trump has several estimable qualities, among them:  his derision and scorn for corporate/multinational welfare, I mean free trade agreements; his oft stated belief that our “military allies” should stop sponging off a bankrupt United States, and carry their own martial/security freight; Mr. Trump’s ready acknowledgment that our economic & political system is deeply corrupt & rigged; and of course, taking on, or at least touching upon, the taboo topics of the national debt and the Federal Reserve, and the politicization of same.

Please… haven’t we all read enough from the mainstream news media that Ms. Yellen & Co. are some how above the political fray.   Yes, consistent with elementary school civics, the women & men wearing black robes are not politicians, and there’s an Easter Bunny and a Tooth Fairy, too.  Ditto a non-political Fed.

The reality is – since Congress campaigns 24/7/365 and has abdicated all responsibility for economic, fiscal, foreign, and tax policy – the Federal Reserve is the only game in town.  The Fed’s chairperson and board of governors are hand picked by the POTUS, and sent to the Senate for review and approval. 

Political?  Perish the thought.

With the power the Fed possesses & wields, perhaps the Fed Chair and her board should be up for national election every four years, and the Chair could then nominate the POTUS for Senate confirmation. 

But I digress because the Fed is the composer of much of what troubles the U.S. economy today.  Indeed, central banks have had similar deleterious impact across the globe.  The Fed and central banks underwrite the credit card economy/ the debt driven economy.  The Fed’s liquidity has fueled consolidation and M&A in industry after industry…. that, and financial engineering on a colossal scale.   Industry consolidation, M&A, and financial engineering are often driven by a need for corporate management to do something, anything, in the face stagnating top line growth. 

The Street, stock analysts, and activist investors demand that management take action, so the dance begins to the beat of a fugue symphony: low demand and stagnant growth fueled by globalization & free trade leads to consolidation and M&A, which leads to job cuts and lower aggregate demand, which leads to more consolidation and financial engineering, etc., etc., etc. (repeat ad nauseam).  The symphony grows louder and the fugue builds with an ocean of private and public debt across the globe. 

How smart is it to do a stock buyback or a merger at a market top (?)… presumably, not very.  History shows that the serial acquiring companies usually perform poorly in an economic downturn, buried under debt and debt service payments (much of which is often at adjustable rates).  In a downturn, short sellers begin to circle, and the feeding frenzy begins.

Who fuels cheap liquidity for consolidation and M&A, the resulting stagnation, and a stock market on roids?   You guessed it, our friends at the Fed… that non-partisan body.  The same folks, who tell us w/ a straight face that they have a dual mandate of maximum employment and keeping inflation in check…. When in reality, the Fed's true mandate is to keep Wall Street financial institutions in the black and the stock market juiced for a happy plutocracy.  There’s a reason why an inordinate number of Fed governors, and twelve regional Fed bank heads, come from Wall Street and are white males.  The Fed, by printing money and suppressing interest rates, pursues its policy of trickle down monetary policy. 

Trickle down tax policy is a proven failure.  In the long run, the debt burden caused by trickle down monetary policy has proven to be a failure, and dovetails – not so nicely – with stagnating wages and rising wage and wealth inequality.  (There's all sorts of bogus nostrums floating around today, about the need for greater productivity, when the nation's true problems are the debt & monopoly driven economy.) 

Given that private and public sectors are both often underwater, in nation after nation, central banks will continue to keep interest rates at all time lows, in order to mitigate debt service loads.

Meanwhile, Congress is off the hook.  The women and men who make up both houses, as long as interests rates are suppressed, don’t have to worry about the national debt, and interest expense on same, crowding out defense, foreign adventures, and entitlement spending (i.e. Medicare, Social Security and Medicaid, etc.)  Nor does Congress feel the need to break up job/opportunity killing cartels & monopolies, which dodge taxes at every turn.

Which means America can continue to abuse what remains of its largely spent Superpower status on the global stage, with endless war, endless nation building, seemingly “sky is the limit” MIC spending, and free military aid – often to countries least in need.

That’s right.  At a time when 20 to 25% of U.S. children live in poverty, and many teens are selling their bodies just to get a bite to eat, Uncle Same has $38 billion to give to Israel, four to five trillion to waste in the Middle East & Afghanistan, and at least a trillion to spend on a nuclear upgrade. 

Who’s to say what the final price tag will be w/ trillions used as a rounding number by DOD accountants.  It’s almost as if America is at war with itself, or the elites are at war with Americans.  Arguably, if one wanted to learn of a way to destroy an empire, one would follow the course we are presently on.  Mr. Blitzer's hand wringing aside, it is morally repugnant to be at war with the world, or be the number one Merchant of Death on the planet, in order to save a couple hundred thousand engineering jobs.

War is the mother of all waste and fraud, as well as, standing armies.   As noted by POTUS Madison – both, war & standing armies - are producers of debt, and debt is a key instrument in bringing the many under the subjugation of the few (read Wall Street banks, the beneficiary & conduit of Federal Reserve policy).  Mr. Madison went onto note: "No nation could preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare."  For further clarification, see the police & surveillance state, and our catastrophic national debt.

A world at war brought to you by that above the fray, apolitical, non-partisan body… The Federal Reserve, and the Wall Street banks it supports, with bailouts and free money.

Let us all join hands and give the Fed a standing ovation.  Encore!  Encore!  Hopefully, the concert will not end under Ms. Yellen’s watch, like it did shortly after the Maestro's.

Who else could keep our wilting empire from foundering; who else would enable multinationals to dodge paying hundreds of billions in back taxes, at the expense of honest tax paying citizens?

Fed & global central bank polices, and their smoking hot printing presses… that’s who.

Copyright JM Hamilton Publishing 2016

Saturday, September 3, 2016

As American as Apple Pie, but Still Schedule I


As American as Apple Pie, but Still Schedule I


As has been well documented, I smoked pot as a kid, and I view it as a bad habit and a vice, not very different from the cigarettes that I smoked as a young person up through a big chunk of my adult life.  I don’t think it is more dangerous than alcohol   - POTUS Obama


By J.M. Hamilton (9-4-2016)


Cannabis is as American as … well… apple pie.   Our founding fathers (Washington, Jefferson, Madison) not only grew hemp (cannabis’ industrial grade cousin), but many of the nation’s leaders ingested it or smoked it.  The bellicose Andrew Jackson, along w/ Zachery Taylor, is said to have enjoyed a pipe full with his troops.  (If only Mr. Jackson had vaped a few hits of Mary Jane before he sent the Cherokee on the Trail of Tears, which resulted in Native-American genocide, perhaps things might have turned out differently?)  President Kennedy smoked cannabis to relieve back pain, as a result of a WWII injury.

The last three U.S. Presidents have all admitted to smoking marijuana.  President Obama said he didn’t think cannabis was any more dangerous than alcohol; and the POTUS is partially right, alcohol is far more dangerous than marijuana, but more on this later.

What’s none too shocking is that the DEA (a government entity that reports up to the Justice Department, which reports to the Executive branch) recently decided to maintain cannabis as a Schedule I drug, that is to say, highly harmful to the American public w/ no redeemable medical value.  Shockingly, opioids and pain pills, and the national epidemic of drug overdoses opioids have created, remain a Schedule II substance.  Now having the DEA rule on this matter presents something of an inherent conflict of interest, akin to asking the lobbying group, the American Petroleum Institute, whether or not the Oil and Gas Industry should continue to enjoy billions in tax breaks.

The DEA’s decision to maintain cannabis as a Schedule I substance also presents a Catch -22, since it’s much harder to test Schedule I labeled drugs to determine medicinal value. 

Since Richard Nixon declared the war on drugs, the U.S. has spent a trillion dollars on prohibition.  The Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) is at the tip of the spear, and on the receiving end of billions in government largess to fight this failed war.  Hence the conflict of interest of having the DEA make the decision on cannabis scheduling, and the resulting impact upon DEA funding. 

Fortunately, the American people already know what the elite, the warrior class, and the medical community say they don’t know: marijuana not only has medicinal benefits, but is a far safer alternative than alcohol, opioid based pain medication, and tobacco. 

Of course, Big Pharma and assorted beer and liquor distributors throughout America already know  - the effectiveness of cannabis in treating pain, epileptic seizures, reducing nausea for cancer sufferers, in shrinking tumors, as a possible treatment for PTSD, and recreationally, as a safer alternative to alcohol consumption – and its why they lobby so hard against legalization.  The bottom line is the bottom line, and cannabis legalization means a hit to Big Pharma’s, Big Tobacco’s, and beer & liquor manufacturer’s and distributor’s profits.  Hence, the endless campaign to malign and vilify the drug.  (Note:  The National Cancer Institute, a Federal government agency, also seems to disagree w/ the DEA’s findings against cannabis' medical potential.)

Twenty-five states have legalized cannabis for medical use, several states have legalized it for recreational use, and more states have simply decriminalized the drug.  The majority of Americans support legalization for medical use.  Even the VA's doctors are now permitted to prescribe cannabis for our nation’s veterans, in states that have authorized medical use.  And cannabis legalization, medical or recreational, is on the November 2016 ballot in nine states.  Watch the California referendum closely, as Cali goes so goes the nation - eventually. 

I’ll hazard another guess - despite the big money lobbying efforts of Big Pharma, Big Tobacco, Big Alcohol, and Sheldon Adelson, casino magnate – cannabis legalization efforts will pass in the majority of these states.  (Note, there appears to be a demographic component to these legalization initiatives: States w/ older voters, say Arizona and Florida, will likely prove more challenging for pro-legalization forces.  Looks like the geriatric crowd has bought into four to five decades of fear-mongering; even though the older demographic would likely be the largest beneficiary of legalized medical cannabis, both in terms of drug efficacy and the curtailment of out of pocket pharmaceutical expense.)  Have you seen how the Super-Villains of Big Pharma have been jacking up the price of medicine recently?

The irony in all this is President Obama, for the most part, got it right.  Cannabis, when matched up to alcohol, pain pills, heroin, and tobacco is much safer.  As noted in Vox:  

Overdose on heroin? You might die. Overdose on cocaine? You also might die. Alcohol? The same.

But marijuana? You won’t die.

Compare that to tobacco, which the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) links to 480,000 deaths each year. Or alcohol, which the CDC links to 88,000 deaths each year. Or opioid painkillers and heroin, which were linked to nearly 29,000 drug overdose deaths in 2014.

The total number of marijuana overdose deaths, meanwhile, is zero.

As noted in the same Vox piece, and as exhibited by an Omaha man, who unknowingly ingested his adult children’s pot brownies, you just might call the house cat, “bitch.”  But in another Vox piece, the writer cites the CDC about the harm & mayhem society’s legal drugs cause on a daily basis:

The available data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) shows tobacco, alcohol, and opioid painkillers were responsible for more direct deaths in one year than any other drug. 

Alcohol-caused health problems, such as liver disease, led to more than 30,000 deaths in 2014. But that actually undercounts the number of deaths caused by alcohol: When including other causes of death like drunk driving and homicides, the toll rises to 88,000 per year.

Nearly 42,000 of the total 480,000 deaths from smoking are caused by secondhand smoke.

One might think that if the DEA really cared about Americans, and not about their budget, they’d list alcohol, opioids, and tobacco, as Schedule I drugs, and knock cannabis down a notch or two.  Then again, it was - the Godfather of the Drug War - Richard Nixon’s own commission (the National Commission on Marihuana and Drug Abuse) that recommended marihuana legalization in small amounts.  Nixon crushed and buried that recommendation, post-haste.

You see, beyond the money Big Pharma, Big Liquor & Tobacco make off of keeping cannabis criminalized, there’s a racial, or arguably a racist, component to keeping cannabis Schedule I.  Mr. Nixon, some may recall, had created the Southern Strategy, a political strategy that encouraged traditional Southern White democrats – angry over Demo passage of civil rights legislation in the 60s – to convert over to the GOP.  During the 60s and 70s marijuana was more closely associated with minority usage and distribution.  And so when Mr. Nixon waged his drug war, he was also waging a war on minorities and minority voters (as prisoners and convicted felons are, or are often, disenfranchised).  And POTUS’ Reagan and Clinton took the drug war and ran it further up the field, cracking down even harder – largely at the minority population’s expense.

It’s no accident then that minorities are far more likely than whites to be locked up for drug possession and distribution.  It’s no accident that America has the largest prison population in the world.  It’s also no accident that law enforcement, and private prison corporations, have lobbied heavily against the decriminalization of cannabis, and stand to gain financially by keeping pot on Schedule I.

So what have we covered so far in the DEA’s recent decision:  quite possibly, the DEA’s naked self-interest; a money grab by Big Alcohol, Pharma, & Tobacco or preservation of the status quo and profits; the commercialization of “legal” drugs that are far more dangerous to society, than all the illegal drugs combined; and a decision that is responsible for the perpetuation of the mass incarceration state and a thriving privatized prison industry?  And don’t forget the U.S. police state (local, state & federal) is armed to the teeth, w/ cutting edge military and surveillance technology.  Yep, the MIC and the Surveillance state contractors also have zero incentive to see cannabis made legal.  

Per the Huffington Post: Despite an increased emphasis on treatment and prevention programs in recent years, the Obama administration in its 2013 budget still requested $25.6 billion in federal spending on the drug war. Of that, $15 billion would go to law enforcement, interdiction and international efforts.





But wait, there’s more because as we all know… despite the aforementioned information, cannabis is the demon weed.

·      There’s a body of research that shows that pain pill abuse and overdose decline where cannabis is legal.

·      Medicare prescription drug savings, in the 17 states where cannabis is legal (the study covered a period through 2013), is estimated at 165 million dollars. The authors of that study also estimated that had cannabis been legal in all fifty states Medicare would have enjoyed a half billion dollar savings.

·      From ’96 through ’14, Purdue enjoyed $27 billion in sales from painkillers… painkillers that have now sparked a national heroin epidemic.

·      Employers also stand to gain from legal cannabis.  Early studies suggest there is less employee absenteeism in states that have made the drug legal.

·      Another study shows that cannabis abuse and dependency is down in states that have made the drug legal.

·      Another study shows that in Colorado marijuana use has not climbed among teens.

·      Drug related crime is down in Colorado.

·      There is less domestic violence in families where the adults smoke marijuana.

Funny, I didn’t hear the DEA mention any of these studies or findings.   Time doesn’t permit me to go into the foreign policy aspect of the failed Drug War (quick thoughts are: the Drug War is mostly fought on foreign soil, which explains why many of our Latin American neighbors have recently legalized, or are more open to cannabis legalization; Afghanistan – under U.S. occupation - remains the biggest producer and purveyor of heroin and opium; and it’s been pretty well documented that the CIA stood by, while crack cocaine was introduced to the Southern California black community, in order to finance Reagan’s war against communism in Central America during the 80s). 

Okay got to wrap this up…

I’m not pretending for one moment that cannabis is a panacea for all that ails America.  Yes, it would give our farmers a cash crop; yes, it would wipeout substantive swaths of organized crime; yes, it would give revenue hungry states another income source; yes, decriminalization would cut the expense of a hyper-militarized police & mass incarceration state; yes, there would be less overdoses from the poison Big Pharma and Liquor distributors, and merchants, sell to the American people, daily.

But what about the profits from these legal and legitimate industries: Big Pharma; Liquor & Wine; Defense contractors & Private Prison contractors?  They desperately need this Drug War to be maintained.  Quarterly income statements demand it.

At the end of the day, whether you are a libertarian or liberal, GOP or Dem, fiscal conservative or social-democrat/green, there’s gotta be something about the DEA’s decision that, hopefully, upsets you on some level.   In pulling this piece together, the deeper I went on research…  well, let’s just say it’s disappointing.  The DEA’s position and decision speaks to the rank dysfunction that Americans see in Washington on a daily basis… where moneyed interests and the politics of the status quo (in lieu of the “change,” we thought we were voting for) triumph over common sense and the national good.

Copyright JM Hamilton Publishing 2016


Friday, August 19, 2016

Deus Ex Machina (aka Dem)

 
Deus Ex Machina (aka Dem)


Nul ne peut servir deux maîtres. Car, ou il haïra l'un, et aimera l'autre; ou il s'attachera à l'un, et méprisera l'autre. Vous ne pouvez servir Dieu et Mamon.  - Matthieu 6:24

By J.M. Hamilton  8-20-2016

Paris, France - Greetings from the City of Light, the City of Enlightenment.  Paris is gorgeous, singular in its wonder, decadence, and depravity.  The city’s beauty is only exceeded by the women who live and visit here.  Her streets are teaming with youth and life, and a noticeable number of men and women carrying machine guns; the latter to be expected, in light of recent terrorist events, and accepted and appreciated by the former.

Around Paris’ every corner seemingly exists a monument, icon, or castle:  Arc de Triomphe, the Hotel de Invalides, and the Tuileries Palace, et al.  Around every corner a stunning work of art, in the flesh.   

And of course, the most jaw dropping monument of all:  Versailles.  Versailles symbolizes a Rococo age, where a disengaged, oblivious, and debauched elite facilitated a revolution that shocked European monarchies and ushered forth a democratic age.  As a student of economics, power, and politics I am often amazed at how often history repeats itself.   Several generations may come and go between history’s great events, sleep covers our eyes, and tombs enclose indispensible women & men – who might lead us away from the folly the human race often repeats ad nauseam.

It’s worth remembering then the women of Paris (yes – the women), who massed and invaded a rococo Versailles, and dragged Louis the XVI and Marie Antoinette from their gilded cage.

Versailles has many lessons… perhaps applicable, here and now, in real time.  To wit, some of the direct causes of the French revolution:

The French kingdom was overextended financially as a result of two wars: the Seven Years War and the American Revolutionary War (both wars fought – largely – against French rival the British).

As a result of these wars, and the excessive living of the nobles and the royal family (see Versailles), the French kingdom was bankrupt.

As a result of the debt and the debt service load, the royal family piled on the taxes, which were carried by the proletariat and the merchant classes.  The nobles, the clergy, and the royal family were, conveniently, exempt from paying taxes.

The Justice system was two-tiered.  A system was in place for the elite, and for everyone else – there was no adjudication means.

Louis XVI' reign saw the rise of a new economic system called laissez faire, whereby the sale of wheat and bread – a French staple - were deregulated.  As a result, merchants and speculators hoarded wheat, and sold into areas where there was a crop failure for the highest prices.  This created shortages and famine.  Prior to laissez faire, the French kings were known for intervening in the wheat marketplace to protect subjects from predatory behavior.

Culturally, the proletariat - French citizens and soldiers -were exposed to new ideas of  “equality” and “freedom.”  Some of these ideas were picked up or learned fighting in America’s revolutionary war.  Reason and enlightenment said the King and the Church were no longer infallible.

Laissez faire, an oblivious elite, and a highly unfair tax system pushed the lowest rung of French society up against the wall.  With the proletariat’s very survival at stake, the aforementioned events launched a perfect storm, whereby the aristocracy and the monarchy were ultimately purged.

Does any of this sound familiar?

The times are not entirely dissimilar to events leading up to the French revolution.  In short, the U.S. political elite – co-opted and owned by the financial aristocracy – have become entirely desensitized to the needs of the 99%.  Our courts are two- tiered and a train wreck.  Laissez faire economics has enjoyed an unprecedented run, whereby free trade agreements have exported the 99%’ jobs, daily bread, and the tax base offshore.  Laissez faire also led to the banking deregulation that crushed the world economy.  Two nation building exercises/wars have bankrupted the U.S. government (along w/ a Wall Street bank bailout); and since a purchased U.S. government will not raise taxes on the wealthy, austerity has been enforced, resulting in cuts to education, social services, and welfare for those most in need.  The remains of the middle class and upper middle class pay at tax rates considerably higher than our true rulers, the billionaire class and multinational corporations (aka the aristocracy). 

The U.S. government for a brief shining moment, post WWII, used to look out for the proletariat, but now politicians mainly look out for themselves and the aforementioned aristocracy.



Entre one Madam Hillary Clinton, who despite many self-inflicted political wounds, appears – as of this writing – to be destined for the White House.  What exactly she’ll accomplish as the first woman POTUS remains to be seen, as she will likely be under investigation for the next four years.

Madam Hillary, despite her many glaring deficiencies, has declared herself to be something of a deus ex machina.  That it to say, HRC is: a “progressive who likes to get things done;” a friend of billionaires & the Wall Street banking cartel; a War Hawk; a friend of the proletariat, and a mass incarceration queen.  She’s also a philanthropist, whose foundation is presently being probed by the IRS.  Madam Clinton has supported free trade agreements that have gutted the American middle class, and yet, she’s now, allegedly, against such agreements – at least in their present form, currently.

Hillary and her husband have told so many lies about her email server, that the Washington Post has in a matter of weeks awarded Madam and Slick four and three Pinocchios, respectively.

In short, Madam Clinton is all things to all people, but above all – if we are to be believe our current POTUS – she is an extraordinary politician with unprecedented capabilities.

And therein lies the problem.  Now, perhaps more than ever, we need a President who can tell the elite, the special interests, and the rich, who have robbed this country blind, where exactly to get off.  The U.S. doesn’t need a fantasy literary device; the nation does not need a deus ex machina.  If Hillary is a servant to all special interests, her Presidency, if elected, is doomed to failure.  Given the state of the nation, HRC just might take the nation with her.

HRC does not appear to get it… her aristo sponsors & the U.S. political establishments, like the Royals & aristocracy of pre-revolutionary France, have run the United States into the ground.  Therefore, if Madam is to be an effective President – and start cleaning up the mess neocon-men, Wall Street, and the billionaire class have wreaked upon the nation – she’s going to have to start by telling some very privileged nobility something they haven’t heard in a very long time, if ever:  “NO.”

An interesting side note, the French revolutionaries who took out the monarchy were somewhat distrustful of democracy, so they formed a republic and a great terror ensued.  After a period of years, and with the State of France’s affairs in great disorder (much of that disorder inherited from a highly corrupt monarchy), a strongman and a military leader came to power.

That dictator, later the Empereur des Francais, was Napoleon Bonaparte.

 
Brave French police & soldiers outside Notre Dame de Paris, Mid-August 2016

Copyright JM Hamilton Publishing 2016

Sunday, August 7, 2016

McKinsey




McKinsey


Our strategy is basically the education I had through McKinsey.

-       Former Valeant Pharmaceutical, CEO, Michael Pearson, Financial Times.

Short-term capital will beget short-term management through a natural chain of incentives and influence.

-       McKinsey & Company, Managing Director, Dominic Barton, Financial Times


By J.M. Hamilton (8-7-16)


You can’t make this stuff up.

On the heels of writing my last piece on the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and how it acts against the interests of ordinary Americans on a daily basis, the Washington Post came out with a story, Thursday, showing how the Chamber is suing the Obama Administration for attempting to put the brakes on tax inversions.  Tax inversions are where multinational corporations enjoy all the advantages of U.S. citizenship (the rule of law; the best democracy money can buy; and a military that is at war w/ the world to protect global trade routes), without paying for it.  No, said multinational, in this case Pfizer, rips off the American consumer and taxpayer daily (the U.S. is the only Western democracy that does not cap drug prices), and enjoys patent protections enforced by U.S. courts and free trade agreements (in essence a monopoly), and then has the audacity to bitch about paying taxes.

The Chamber and its éminence grise, Mr. Donohue, loves to fall back on the tired old argument that the U.S. has the highest corporate tax rate in the world, and therefore, Pfizer is entitled to dodge taxes, via foreign inversion.  But the Chamber, conveniently, fails to mention that for the uber wealthy, and the corporate tax code in particular, is loaded w/ enough loopholes to sink the ship of state.  Pfizer of course, pays at a tax rate nowhere close to 35%, but Pfizer sure likes to make monopolistic profits in this country, and does so daily. 

One could easily argue that the Chamber’s actions are Anti-American and unpatriotic. Once again, the Chamber is lobbying’s super villain, that is to say, an evil rapacious machine – making arguments – that its corporate contributors and members wouldn’t dare make, for fear of offending the American public and stockholders.

If the Chamber is lobbying’s bête noire, than McKinsey & Company is the consulting world’s equivalent.  McKinsey & Company is based in New York City, and its global consulting empire, as recently as 2014, was said to generate $8.3 billion in revenue.  McKinsey is privately held by 1,400 partners, and employs 17,000 workers worldwide.  Additionally, it is the wheelhouse for 9,000 consultants, many of them MBAs or persons possessing graduate degrees, if not doctorates.  It not only counsels the Fortune 500, but many of its consultants end up running the companies they advise.  C-Suites and boardrooms are littered w/ former McKinsey associates and executives.  And just because an associate or partner leaves for greener pastures doesn’t mean those McKinsey ties are severed.  As revealed earlier this year in the Financial Times, McKinsey also operates a $9.5 billon dollar hedge fund for its employees and partners, that helps insure continued loyalty, and partnership, even after an employee leaves.

To give one some idea of McKinsey’s clout and power, a recent Forbes article, quoting from the book The Firm, observed:

 “A few years ago, more than 70 past and present CEOs of Fortune 500 companies were McKinsey alumni, and in 2011 more than 150 McKinsey alumni were running companies with more than $1 billion in annual sales.”

So with all this consulting going on, and consolidation in industry after industry into cartels and monopolies, isn’t there a conflict of interest?   Many observers and writers say that the McKinsey business model produces an inherent conflict of interest.  One of McKinsey’s key offerings is industry benchmarking, or “best practices,” where a company can see what industry peers are up to.  Conveniently omitted are competitor names, but if there are only three or four players left in a given industry it’s not hard to figure out, thanks to McKinsey, who is employing said “best practices.”  

Hmmm... sounds like collusion defined, via an intermediary.

There’s more… McKinsey is the master consultant of financial engineering practices that have devastated many advanced economies.  Need to cut staff to boost the bottom line, bring McKinsey in for a study.  Consultation on M&A and industry consolidation, and the resulting “synergy,” McKinsey is there to hold a multinational’s hand.  If one was nefarious, and looking for the Xanadu of insider information – in industry after industry – McKinsey affords an ocean of data and information.

Perhaps that’s why so many McKinsey alumni have landed in hot water, or have flirted with disaster.  McKinsey’s consultants and partners are consummate insiders, possessing information that would allow them, or friends, to make a killing in any number of markets: stock, bonds, commodities, futures, derivatives, and swaps.  

Rajat Gupta is perhaps one of the more infamous McKinsey alums, brought down by insider trading.  Information Mr. Gupta picked up, by sitting on the board of Goldman Sachs, was shared with a hedge fund operator.  Mr. Jeff Skilling learned a thing or two from McKinsey, before moving on to help cook the books at Enron (accounting gymnastics were employed that brought that company to ruin).  Tidjane Thiam, who presently runs Credit Suisse, has suffered some risk management problems as of late, and Credit Suisse has reported close to a billion dollars in losses in late 2015 and early 2016.  Looks like some Suisse trading positions went south, in some illiquid markets.  Before running Credit Suisse – you guessed it – Mr. Thiam was a McKinsey employee.  To be sure, not all McKinsey alums have come to a bad end.  Mr. Sundar Pichai and Ms. Sheryl Sandberg, of Google and Facebook fame, respectively, appear to have done very well.

However, if there is one person who epitomizes the McKinsey ethos, and what that ethos has done to the American & advanced economies, it is former Valeant Pharmaceutical CEO, Michael Pearson.  In news reports, we learned that Mr. Pearson surrounded himself w/ friends from McKinsey, when he took over Valeant Pharmaceutical.  Then he did a tax inversion deal - the Chamber and Mr. Donohue are presently raving about - to dodge paying U.S. taxes.  But what Mr. Pearson did next is right out of the McKinsey playbook:  he loaded up Valeant with a debt tsunami; acquired drug company after drug company (often at or near market peaks); a la Enron, he was alleged to have cooked the books, with some shady accounting and drug wholesalers; Mr. Pearson stripped the labor force of Valeant and its acquisitions; gutted R&D; and jacked up the price of medicine in a manner that Jeffrey Shkreli could appreciate.

If this seems all too familiar to many Americans, it’s not only because what Mr. Pearson did epitomizes the McKinsey way, but it is also the business model for an entire industry, otherwise known as private equity.  Hedge funds too, love the McKinsey model, and more than a handful of hedge funds took a severe beating when Valeant’s stock tanked.  But fear not…. Mr. Pearson – who once was a paper billionaire – enjoyed a nice severance package, while Valeant’s stockholders are said to be taking epileptic medicine to calm their seizures.

All this information (shared for the price of a consulting contract), all this industry consolidation, the incestuous board room & C suite relations, the cult like embrace of McKinsey’s current and former consultants and partners… and the $9.5 billion dollar hedge fund McKinsey operates (amazingly, has only lost money once in 25 years), w/ all appropriate firewalls and protections against impropriety (we are solemnly assured)… If there ever was a company that personifies all the economic problems America faces today, it, likely, could be summed up in one word: McKinsey.

Conflict of interest magnified exponentially, and a cadre of elite insiders rigging the game for themselves and a select few: McKinsey & Company?





And now, wait for it… Here comes the punch line…. There appears to be some remorse.   

Per a recent Bloomberg piece, McKinsey – in light of Brexit, and the American electorate’s near rabid response to anything smacking of an establishment politician  - is having a quiet reflective moment.  With both U.S. political parties rebelling against free trade, embracing Glass Steagall, and rejecting globalization and the resulting U.S. pink slips - the consultant firm was such a strong advocate for - McKinsey appears to have turned the corner.  To be sure, McKinsey, per a recent write up assures us, the organization still finds value in offshoring, immigration, trade, and so forth, but these things must be done with more “sophistication.”  Lest advanced economies and Western democracies blow up like a city block with a gas leak, as McKinsey’s Senior Partner, Richard Dobbs, recently put it.


I guess crushing the labor force, and with it aggregate demand, in a consumer driven economy, isn’t particularly brilliant, especially in the long run.


Copyright JM Hamilton Publishing 2016