The Suspension of Disbelief & The New Right-Wing
Some
of the left’s most influential voices and groups are taking offense at the way
they and their causes were discussed behind their backs by Clinton and some of
her closest advisers in the emails, which swipe liberal heroes and causes as
“puritanical,” “pompous”,
“naive”,
“radical” and “dumb,” calling some “freaks,” who need to “get a life.”
- WikiLeaks poisons Hillary’s relationship with Left –
Politico
Neera
Tanden,
the president of the Center for American Progress, e-mailed
Podesta shortly before an appearance on CNN,
as she was going through some talking points about Clinton’s then rival, Bernie Sanders.
“Do we actually know who told Hillary she could use a private email? And has
that person been drawn and quartered?” she asked. “[This] whole thing is
fucking insane.”
- Even the Clinton Campaign Was Blindsided by Her E-mail Scandal – Vanity Fair, Hive
By J.M. Hamilton (10-31-2016)
Trick or treat? The
question is no longer rhetorical.
What has been a treat for reporters, pundits, scribes, and MSM
income statements has become a bad trick, or nightmare, for ordinary
Americans. JMH writes, of course, of the
2016 Presidential campaign, where just when one thinks it cannot possibly go
any lower, or sleazier, a new revelation comes to light. Both mainstream candidates are so mired in
their own goo, hypocrisy, and revelations that – depending upon which poll you
read - the majority of Americans dislike both candidates.
The latest news is that the FBI Director has - based upon Mr. Anthony Weiner’s laptop – reopened Madame Clinton’s email investigation. Mr. Weiner is a former congressman, and estranged
husband from Clinton aide, Ms. Huma Abedin.
Based upon what we know so far, Mr. Weiner is under investigation by the
FBI for sexting an underage woman, when his laptop revealed emails from the
Clinton State Department & her private server. (Sounds sort of General Patraeus doesn’t it,
whose affair & emails led to his downfall?)
Director Comey has been under considerable pressure for not bringing
charges against Mrs. Clinton; and with the GOP led house promising to
investigate a POTUS Clinton for the next four years, perhaps the Director is
worried about what the House GOP might uncover?
That last point is pure speculation on my part, as to why the
FBI Director re-opened the investigation.
However, when Mr. Comey had every reason to bring the hammer down upon
Mrs. Clinton, based upon the FBI’s original investigation – if for nothing else then Mrs. Clinton’s pathological and preternatural ability to lie, constantly …
Why reopen the case now?
For oldsters who can remember, the whole sordid affair of
secrecy, cover ups, pay to play, politicians believing they are above the law,
and the steady drip of incriminating evidence (in this instance, courtesy of
Wikileaks) has a Nixonesque quality to it.
The whiff of Watergate is in the atmosphere.
Friday the stock market took a mild hit, and a hint of panic
crept into the air. The Establishment’s
gal might be on the ropes. Even if she
does manage to enter into the White House, it will likely be by the skin of her
teeth, under threat of serial investigations, and possibly, pending impeachment
hearings.
What a great role model for girls and boys. So much for the progressive - who likes to
get things done.
Which helps explain why Mrs. C has struggled so much with millennials;
the youngsters know she’s a crook and aren’t buying what she’s selling.
Hillary defines a generation of corrupt politicians – willing
to say anything, depending upon the audience – and far too eager to do the
plutocracy’s bidding for a little payola.
Living proof, as JMH has long argued, that Americans truly do live in a
one party state; or more generously, a two party state, controlled, owned, and
ruled by an all-powerful oligarchy.
What’s that you say?
There’s a boatload of differences between the two major parties? Perhaps on social issues, there are still
some differences, and these social differences should not be taken lightly. But even here, the GOP
– and its socially conservative base - often finds itself reined in on social
issues, by the power of the oligarchy’s purse.
If the GOP, or a Republican governor, gets too reactionary, convention
business, NCAA finals, and big biz tends to leave town.
Still disagree with me?
Okay, let's suspend disbelief for a moment, and forget the last 24 months
of campaigning. What politician am I
describing?
Generals, neocons, and MIC lobbyist have supported this
candidate. Republicans have been
rallying to the candidate. This
candidate has historically been a huge supporter of free trade agreements, that
have benefited multinational corporations at the expense of ordinary Americans,
U.S. jobs, and the tax base. Said
candidate has been highly supportive of fracking, and hence, fossil fuels that
are damaging to the environment. Our
candidate and her advisors – per a recent Politico
article – has referred to liberals & progressives as: “puritanical,” “pompous”, “naive”, “radical” and “dumb,” calling some
“freaks,” who need to “get a life.” As for foreign
policy, our candidate is more hawkish than the current administration, which is presently bombing no less than seven countries.
As for the Federal Reserve, our candidate believes the Fed, & its
Chairperson, are beyond reproach and above criticism (despite plenty of
evidence that the central bank has contributed to a massive debt bubble &
enabled a multi-trillion dollar federal deficit). Said candidate is a friend of Wall Street,
and for six figure fees, soothed and assuaged bankster feelings of anxiety,
post 2008 Crash.
So rarified is the air this individual breathes, this
candidate has self-acknowledged being out of touch with ordinary
Americans. The candidate in question
pandered to law & order/dog whistle politics of the '90s, referring to young
black men as super-predators, and supported the mass incarceration state. Under this candidate’s political party’s
watch, merger and acquisitions (M&A) soared, and in the resulting Ayn Rand dystopia,
job killing monopolies and cartels now dominate industry after industry, and economic sector after economic sector.
Throughout the '90s and into the present day, this candidate’s party –
thanks to support for free trade & a failure to address trickle down tax
policies – helped to oversee: the destruction of the middle class, wage
stagnation, and rising wage & wealth inequality.
Ordinarily, I’d say JMH was describing a mainstream Republican
POTUS candidate, but no, the aforementioned candidate is one, Madame Hillary
Clinton.
There’s a tectonic schism in the GOP, often described and predicted by this blog, where the Republican elites are highly disconnected
with the interests of their base. Hence,
like rats fleeing a sinking ship, many GOP elite have latched onto Team Clinton
and the Democratic Party.
There’s just one problem with this strategy.
If Dems continue to co-opt/triangulate neo-liberal economic
policies, and neocon foreign policies, the Democratic base will eventually
awaken from their slumber, too, and see through the same nonsense (the GOP’s
base has already discovered). That process already seems underway.
In the meantime, the U.S. is in turmoil, as are most Western
democracies. Seems that the 99% are no
longer willing to sit idly by, while the elite/plutocracy write the rules - and pig out at the government trough –
solely for their benefit.
For additional clues see the rise of nationalist parties in
Europe, Brexit, and one Mr. Donald Trump.
Heh, who needs ghosts and goblins, when there’s nothing
scarier than a rapacious, and nonsentient, zombie-plutocracy that governs us
all?
Happy Hallows’ Eve!
Copyright JM Hamilton Publishing 2016